Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM. Julio Estrada-Hernandez is a- 34-year-old Mexican citizen who has been removed from the United States as an alien convicted of controlled-substance offenses, a firearm offense (an aggravated felony), and crimes involving moral turpitude. See 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2). First an immigration judge and then the Board of Immigration Appeals rejected his efforts to avoid removal, and so he has now turned to this court for

AMENDED ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Jose Luis Estrada-Hernandez (“Estrada”) and Jose Luis Farias-Hernandez’ (the “Beneficiary”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“MSJ”). (Plaintiffs’ MSJ, ECF No. 23.) Also before the Court is Defendant’s Combined Cross-MSJ and Opposition to Plaintiffs’ MSJ

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge, with whom SILVERMAN and BEA, Circuit Judges, join, concurring in the judgment: The “absolute disparity” test, which we have employed for nearly forty years, leaves no doubt that Hernandez-Estrada’s fair cross section claims fail under Duren’s second prong. See Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357, 364, 99 S.Ct. 664, 58 L.Ed.2d 579 (1979). For this reason, I agree wit

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50417 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:10-cr-00558-BTM-1 SALVADOR HERNANDEZ- ESTRADA, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. Filed September 9, 2013 ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judg

ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth

OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: The question in this appeal is whether the United States District Court for the Southern District of California violated the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968 (“JSSA”) or the Constitution in compiling its 2009 master jury wheel. Although the Southern District departed from the requirements of the JSSA in several re-*1019<

PER CURIAM: * Andres Hernandez-Estrada appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following a prior felony conviction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b). For the first time on appeal, Hernandez-Estrada argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi

PER CURIAM: Defendants-appellants Jaime Estrada-Fernandez and Jose Valenzuela-Hernandez appeal their convictions for assault with a dangerous weapon pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). They contend that the district court erred in failing to give certain lesser-included-offense instructions to the jury. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court’s judgment of con

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ȱ No.ȱ15Ȭ2336ȱ JULIOȱESTRADAȬHERNANDEZ,ȱ Petitioner,ȱ v.ȱ LORETTAȱE.ȱLYNCH,ȱAttorneyȱGeneralȱ ofȱtheȱUnitedȱStates,ȱ Respondent.ȱ ____________________ȱ P

115 F.3d 695 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Luis MAGALLON, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Luis E. ESTRADA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gerardo DELGADO-GARIBAY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-104

EDWIN F. HUNTER, Jr., District Judge: On September 16, 1988, the grand jury for the El Paso Division of the Western District of Texas returned a superseding indictment charging Audelio Arzola-Ama-ya (“Arzola-Amaya”) as a principal administrator, organizer, and the leader of a continuing criminal enterprise, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848(b). In addition, all six Appellants, A

113 F.3d 150 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3298, 97 Daily JournalD.A.R. 5709UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Luis MAGALLON, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Luis E. ESTRADA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gerardo DELGADO-GA

768 F.Supp.2d 289 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Christian Fernando BORDA, et al., Defendants. Criminal Action No. 07-0065 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 9, 2011. *290 Paul W. Laymon, Robert J. Raymond, Charles D. Griffith, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plain

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-22-00151-CV CITY OF MADISONVILLE, Appellant v. IVAN ARISTIDES CRUZ HERNANDEZ, ANDREW DIAZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF APOLO ESTRADA DIAZ, AND MARIA DIAZ, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF APOLO ESTRADA DIAZ, Appellees

*159Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;

*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied,

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.