Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Alberto Esquivel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Esquivel has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant po

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82);

540 U.S. 1012 AZANON-RODASv.UNITED STATESMERCADO-VARGAS, AKA BERRONES VARGAS, AKA PEREZv.UNITED STATESMOLINA-RODRIGUEZv.UNITED STATESNUNEZ-VILLAv.UNITED STATESORTIZ-RAMIREZv.UNITED STATESPACHECO-HERRERAv.UNITED STATESRAMIREZ-BOVADILLA, AKA CORREA-ESQUIVELv.UNITED STATESSEGURA-CARRERAv.UNITED STATESCISNEROS-PEREZv.UNITED STATESGUARDIOLA-SALAS<

(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (

(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82);

(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2443 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:22-cr-02762- TWR-1 v. DENYS KOROTKIY, OPINION Defendant - Appellant.

Appellate Case: 21-2151 Document: 010110825909 Date Filed: 03/14/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 14, 2023 FO

HOLLY L. TEETER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant Robert Odsor Hampton III, who is charged with possession of a firearm and ammunition by a prohibited person, moves to suppress the ammunition found in his pocket and the gun found in the vehicle in which he was riding. Although he concedes the validity of the initial traffic stop, he contends law enforcement violated his Fourth Amendment rights by unlawfully extending the scope

Case: 25-30192 Document: 101-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 18, 2026

STRAS, Circuit Judge. We consider whether "willful" aggravated assault under North Dakota law qualifies as a "crime of violence" under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We conclude that it does not and accordingly vacate and remand for resentencing. I. In 2012, Leland Schneider pleaded guilty to felony aggravated assault in North Dakota

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 20-1778 _____________ BALJINDER SINGH, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent _______________ On Petition for Review of an Order of the United

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Vincent Watson was convicted by a jury of five counts *1222 relating to the cultivation and distribution of marijuana. He raises three challenges to his conviction on appeal: (1) that his second counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to adequ

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ERIC F. MELGREN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Crystal Zoe Amarillas-Norzagaray’s Motion to Suppress (Doc. 23). Amarillas-Norzagaray contends that all evidence and statements obtained during a traffic stop should be suppressed because the stop was not justified at its inception and because she was not read her Miranda rights. Because the Court agrees t

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. Pending before the Court are numerous pre-trial motions filed by six defendants and the government.1 All six defendants have filed motions to suppress evidence seized through physical searches of their homes or homes to which they had a connection; defendant Scurry moves to suppress evidence seized diming a search o

GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: This is a consolidated appeal of two cases brought against Javier Guerrero, an individual the government alleged was the leader of the Texas Mexican Mafia in Uvalde. The first case, which involved racketeering charges including the commission of two murders in aid of racketeering, resulted in guilty verdicts and the imposition of five life sentences.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal Case No. 10-310 (RCL)