⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Esquivel-Perez”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012-06-19 · Published · cited 0× · 471 F. App'x 380
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Alberto Esquivel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Esquivel has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant po
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008-07-22 · Published · cited 3× · 534 F.3d 817; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15567; 2008 WL 2796717
534 F.3d 817 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Bismarck GUILLEN-ESQUIVEL, also known as Luis Nieves Perez, Appellee. No. 07-3089. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 13, 2008. Filed: July 22, 2008. William Anders Folk, AUSA, argued, Rachel K. Paulose, AUSA, on the brief, Minneapolis, MN for Appellant. K
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 97 F. App'x 305
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-03-06 · Published · cited 0× · 61 F. App'x 690
LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-11-10 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1012
(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82);
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-11-10 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1012; 124 S. Ct. 553
540 U.S. 1012 AZANON-RODASv.UNITED STATESMERCADO-VARGAS, AKA BERRONES VARGAS, AKA PEREZv.UNITED STATESMOLINA-RODRIGUEZv.UNITED STATESNUNEZ-VILLAv.UNITED STATESORTIZ-RAMIREZv.UNITED STATESPACHECO-HERRERAv.UNITED STATESRAMIREZ-BOVADILLA, AKA CORREA-ESQUIVELv.UNITED STATESSEGURA-CARRERAv.UNITED STATESCISNEROS-PEREZv.UNITED STATESGUARDIOLA-SALAS<
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-11-10 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1012
(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82);
Esquivel v. Perezpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976-03-04 · Published · cited 0× · 529 F.2d 520
529 F.2d 520 Esquivelv.Perez 74-2853 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 3/4/76 1 S.D.Tex. 2 AFFIRMED***
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-02-10 · Published · cited 2× · 127 F.4th 1204
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2288 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:19-cr-05000- BHS-1 v. LAMAR ALLEN THOMPSON, OPINION Defendant - Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021-05-17 · Published · cited 4× · 997 F.3d 408
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 18-2247 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JAMES STEWART-CARRASQUILLO, Defendant, Appellant. No. 19-1008 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. HAROLD ESQUILIN-MONTAÑEZ,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2026-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 25-30192 Document: 101-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 18, 2026
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-09-28 · Published · cited 33× · 905 F.3d 1088
STRAS, Circuit Judge. We consider whether "willful" aggravated assault under North Dakota law qualifies as a "crime of violence" under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We conclude that it does not and accordingly vacate and remand for resentencing. I. In 2012, Leland Schneider pleaded guilty to felony aggravated assault in North Dakota
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-03-20 · Published · cited 53× · 885 F.3d 300
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-4296 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TAISON MCCOLLUM, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cr-00199-MOC-DCK-1) Argued: J
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015-10-09 · Published · cited 3× · 628 F. App'x 400
DANNY C. REEVES, District'Judge. In 2009, while in the United States illegally, Defendant Santos Gomez was convicted in Lake City, Michigan of sexual penetration of a fourteen-year-old girl. At the time of the crime, Gomez was eighteen years of age, but was slightly less than four years older than the victim. Following service of his sentence for this offense, Gomez was removed from this country and returned to his native Gu
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017-05-05 · Published · cited 0× · 855 F.3d 691; 2017 WL 1749654; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8054
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: Following a guilty plea for misprision of a felony, the district court applied a four-level sentencing enhancement for use of a dangerous weapon — shoes in conjunction with the “solid prison floor” — to Defendant-Appellant Rafael Velasco’s sentence. Velasco appeals the enhancement. Finding no error, we AFFIRM. I.
District Court, D. South Dakota · 2014-06-06 · Published · cited 0× · 30 F. Supp. 3d 835; 2014 WL 2566141; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77196
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Jason Long (“Long”) originally was indicted for one count of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, AM 2201, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Doc. 1. A Superseding Indictment added two counts of possessing with t
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020-08-18 · Published · cited 26× · 971 F.3d 165
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 19-1835 _____________ NELIDA BEATRIZ CABEDA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA _______________ On Petition for Review of an Order of the Unite
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020-10-21 · Published · cited 19× · 978 F.3d 860
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 19-1740 ______________ LUIS FERNANDO GRIJALVA MARTINEZ, a/k/a Luis Grijalva, a/k/a Luis Martinez, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respo
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010-07-21 · Published · cited 5× · 613 F.3d 749; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14959; 2010 WL 2836622
613 F.3d 749 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Eddie GARCIA, Appellant. No. 09-2281. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 9, 2010. Filed: July 21, 2010. *751 Jennifer L. Gilg, AFPD, argued, Michael F. Maloney, AFPD, on the brief, Omaha, NE, for Appellant. Susan T. Le
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008-08-27 · Published · cited 21× · 539 F.3d 904; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18341; 2008 WL 3914994
539 F.3d 904 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel P. AZURE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-2443. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February 14, 2008. Filed: August 27, 2008. *906 Richard J. Henderson, AFPD, argued, Fargo, ND, for appellant. Brett M. Shasky, A