Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, and DALY Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jonathan L. ERVIN Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Before HOLIFIELD, HOUTZ, and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ In Re Jonathan ERVIN Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Petitioner _________________________ UNITED STATES Respondent No. 202200145 __________________

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4175 Doc: 43 Filed: 01/10/2023 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4175 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ERVIN DWAYNE LEGGETTE, a/k/a Ervin Dewayne Leggette,

ORDER GRANTING § 2255 MOTION AND SETTING EXPEDITED RE-SENTENCING HEARING Susan P. Watters, United States District Court This case comes before the Court on Defendant/Movant Ervin’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He seeks relief under Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015)1, and Stri

PER CURIAM. Ervin Abbott appeals the district court’s 1 application of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), to his sentence. Abbott argues that two previous convictions for drug offenses *897 should not be counted as tw

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Following a jury trial, Ervin St. Claire (“St. Claire”) was convicted of three counts of aggravated sexual abuse in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 2241(c), as well as three counts of abusive sexual contact in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 2244(a)(5). St. Claire appeals his conviction and sentence, arguing that the district court

818 F.Supp.2d 1314 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Monty ERVIN. Criminal Action No. 1:11cr7-MHT (WO). United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. June 20, 2011. *1316 Michael C. Boteler, Washington, DC, W. Brent Woodall, U.S. Attorney's Office, Montgomery, AL, for United States of America. John Calvin

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Ervin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ervin has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to with

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Ervin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ervin has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to with

540 F.3d 623 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James ERVIN and Jay Zambrana, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 05-4700, 06-1834. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 14, 2008. Decided September 2, 2008. *624 Daniel L. Bella (argued), Office of the United States Attorney,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 05-4700 & 06-1834 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES E RVIN and JAY Z AMBRANA, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States District Co

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge. Dewayne Ervin here appeals his conviction and sentence on charges of drug trafficking and illegal possession of firearms. He contends that the district court committed prejudicial error in the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, the admission of a federal agent’s expert testimony, the dismissal of an absent juror, and the determination of drug quantities for purposes of sentencing. Findin

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3354 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Distr

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6055 Doc: 52 Filed: 03/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 14 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-6055 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JAMES SCOTT ERVIN, JR., Defendant – Appellant.

PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Ervin Kindle appeals the district court’s1 order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We affirm. Kindle was convicted of one count of drug conspiracy, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; three counts of possession of drugs with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841; and two counts of aiding and abetting in the distributi

___________ No. 95-2999 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. The district court denied Ervin Lee a reduction of his ten-year prison sentence in response to the government’s motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b). Lee brings this appeal. The underlying claim by Lee for reduction of sentence has its roots in the extensive and convoluted prosecution of the El Rukn street gang. De

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Ervin Contreras was charged with conspiring to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, possessing methamphetamine with intent to deliver, using a Titan Tiger revolver in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense, and using a “Street Sweeper” semi-automatic shotgun in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense. Contreras moved to suppress evidence seized d

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Ervin J. Klaphake appeals his conviction of two counts of tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201. We affirm. I. Klaphake owned and operated a 500-acre farm in Melrose, Minnesota. In 1983, Norbert Stelton and James Noske, both realtors, and Joan Noske, an accountant and tax return preparer, spoke with