Cases

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence, filed December 1, 2017 (Doc. 78)("Motion"); (ii) the Defendant's Supplemental Motion to Suppress All Evidence Seized and Any Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Obtained as a Result of the Unlawful Search, filed July 24, 2018 (Doc. 141)("Supp. Motion"); (iii) the Defendant Bentley Streett'

665 F.3d 1216 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Enriquez LOPEZ-AVILA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-1200. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 2, 2011. *1217 Barry A. Schwartz, Assistant Federal Public Defender, (Raymond P. Moore, Federal Public Defender, with him on the brief), Denve

761 F.Supp.2d 1172 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Roberto Javier HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant. No. CR 10-0769 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. December 7, 2010. *1177 Kenneth J. Gonzales, United States Attorney, Norman Cairns, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, Plaintiff, Brian

670 F.Supp.2d 1207 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis BELTRAN-RIVERA, Defendant. No. CR 08-2722 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. October 7, 2009. Gregory J. Fouratt, United States Attorney, Mary Catherine McCulloch, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, for the Plaintiff. *1208

585 F.3d 1191 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel MORIEL-LUNA, Miguel Sillas Moriel, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-50124. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted August 31, 2009. Filed October 29, 2009. *1194 Jonathan D. Libby (argued), Federal Public Defender'

555 F.3d 931 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Angel YANEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-2100. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. February 10, 2009. *934 Scott M. Davidson, Albuquerque, NM, for Defendant-Appellant. Gregory J. Fouratt, United States Attorney, (Laura Fashing, A

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: We are presented with a case of conspiracy to smuggle undocumented aliens for commercial gain and attempts to aid and *196 abet the smuggling of undocumented aliens to the United States for commercial gain. This appeal requires us to determine for the first time in this cir

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-50124 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  8:04-cr-00168- MIGUEL MORIEL-LUNA, Miguel JVS-1 Sillas Moriel, OPINION Def

OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. The question presented is whether an alien who has spent more than five years in prison for . an aggravated felony is eligible for a waiver of deportation under former Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 212(c). We hold that he is not. I A native and citizen of

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: David Jennings appeals two convictions: (1) possession of a firearm (a .38 revolver) in relation to a “crime of violence” (possession of an unregistered pipe bomb); and (2) attempted interference with interstate commerce in violation of the Hobbs Act. We affirm. I. David Jennings planned to extort

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: Appellants robbed two J. Jessop’s Jewelry stores in San Diego on July 11 and August 12,. 1992. The robberies were carefully planned operations. Members of the robbery crew posed as customers inside each store. Once these crew members were in position, another member of the crew entered and brandished a pistol. The rest of the crew then sprung into action, cleaning-out each store in a ma

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Juan Agustín Zavala-Sustaita (“Zavala”) asks us to resolve a question of first impression in this circuit: whether sexual indecency with a child by exposure constitutes “sexual abuse of a minor” for purposes of the aggravated felony sentencing enhancement in Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2. Because we conclude that this offense is an aggravated felo

137 F.3d 1094 48 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1184, 98 Cal. Daily Op.Serv. 1360,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1903UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Lamont Benedict NELSON, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Keith Lamar LOTT, aka Kevin Moore, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Kimberly Nichol EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of Ame

BARNES, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction by a jury of two counts in a three count indictment. On April 14, 1963, appellant was stopped entering the United States at the Mexican border. A border search of the automobile he was in, driven by his friend Baumgardner, and owned by Baumgardner’s mother, reveale

WIENER and CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judges: This higher education, reverse racial discrimination case is before us on appeal for the third time. The first appeal (“Hop-wood I”) was interlocutory and affirmed the district court’s denial of intervention sought by several minority rights advocacy organizations.

551 F.3d 1114 (2009) Sara DIAZ-COVARRUBIAS, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 06-70447. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 24, 2008. Filed January 9, 2009. *1115 J. Jack Artz, Norwalk, CA, for the petitioner. Sarah Maloney, United

MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Duran and his two adult sons, Oscar and Miguel Enriquez, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision summarily affirming and adopting the Immigration Judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal under INA § 240A(b)(l), 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l). Although all three Petitioners satisfy the first three of the four requirements for such relief, the IJ

MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Duran and his two adult sons, Oscar and Miguel Enriquez, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision summarily affirming and adopting the Immigration Judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal under INA § 240A(b)(l), 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l). Although all three Petitioners satisfy the first three of the four requirements for such relief, the IJ

Filed 1/30/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, B280781 (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. MA069074) v. MONTRELL LAMONTE TAYLOR, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDUARDO J. ENRIQUEZ, AKA No. 13-72934 Eduardo Jobanny Enriquez, Petitioner, Agency No. A095-465-235 v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an