⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “United States v. Enriquez-Polanco”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021-07-01 · Published · cited 8× · 3 F.4th 542
20-27 Brathwaite v. Garland 1 IN THE 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 ________ 5 AUGUST TERM 2020 6 7 ARGUED: JANUARY 5, 2021 8 DECIDED: JULY 1, 2021 9 10 No. 20-27 11 12 ALDWI
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-06-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00011-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/9/2025 1:42 PM 15-25-00011-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
J. M. ACOSTApublic domain
Board of Immigration Appeals · 2018-07-01 · Published · cited 32× · 27 I. & N. Dec. 420
Cite as 27 I&N Dec. 420 (BIA 2018) Interim Decision #3934 Matter of J. M. ACOSTA, Respondent Decided August 29, 2018 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) A conviction does not attain a sufficient degree of finality for immigration purposes until the right to direct appell
POLANCOpublic domain
Board of Immigration Appeals · 1994-07-01 · Published · cited 2× · 20 I. & N. Dec. 894
Interim Decision #3232 MATTER OF POLANCO In Deportation Proceedings A-34403819 Decided by Board October 21, 1994 (1) An alien who has waived or exhausted the right to a direct appeal of a conviction is subject to deportation, and the potential for discretionary review on direct appeal will not prevent the conviction from being considered final for immigration purposes. (2) Where
CARDENAS ABREUpublic domain
Board of Immigration Appeals · 2009-07-01 · Published · cited 2× · 24 I. & N. Dec. 795
Cite as 24 I&N Dec. 795 (BIA 2009) Interim Decision #3641 Matter of Roberto CARDENAS ABREU, Respondent File A046 046 300 - Marcy, New York Decided May 4, 2009 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A pending late-reinstated appeal of a criminal conviction, filed pursua
PUNUpublic domain
Board of Immigration Appeals · 1998-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 22 I. & N. Dec. 224
Interim Decision #3364 In re Mark Gerald PUNU, Respondent File A72 423 857 - Houston Decided August 18, 1998 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The third prong of the standard for determining whether a conviction exists with regard to deferred adjudications has been eliminated p