⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. English”

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2019-07-30 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Luke D. ENGLISH, Specialist United States Army, Appellant No. 19-0050 Crim. App. No. 20160510 Argued May 21, 2019—D
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2018-07-24 · Published · cited 0× · 333 F. Supp. 3d 1311
Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1312Defendant Timothy Andre English pled guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At his sentencing, the court g
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011-01-20 · Published · cited 40× · 629 F.3d 311; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 1144; 2011 WL 179766
629 F.3d 311 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Derek Andre ENGLISH and Ronald Anderson, Defendants-Appellees. Docket Nos. 10-3258-cr, 10-4045-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: January 4, 2011. Decided: January 20, 2011. *313 Santosh Aravind, Assistant United States Attorney f
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010-12-30 · Published · cited 5× · 757 F. Supp. 2d 900; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137850; 2010 WL 5397288
757 F.Supp.2d 900 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Joshua ENGLISH, Defendant. No. 3:10-CR-53. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. December 30, 2010. *901 John J. Bishop, Attorney at Law, Cedar Rapids, IA, Terence L. McAtee, Iowa Federal Public, Davenport, IA, for Defendant. Lisa C. Will
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 332 F. App'x 850
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Harold English appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. English, No. 3:
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 332 F. App'x 850
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Harold English appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. English, No. 3:
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009-12-16 · Published · cited 3× · 589 F.3d 1373; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 27524; 2009 WL 4827505
589 F.3d 1373 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald G. ENGLISH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-12788 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. December 16, 2009. *1374 Chet Kaufman and Randolph P. Murrell, Fed. Pub. Defenders, Tallahassee, FL, for English. Stephen P. Pre
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008-09-17 · Published · cited 0× · 293 F. App'x 39
SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Sheldon English appeals from a July 13, 2007 judgment of conviction of the District Court. Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Defendant was acquitted of possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and, accordingly, the jury did not reach a third count charging p
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-06-17 · Published · cited 0× · 135 F. App'x 94
MEMORANDUM ** Chad Allen English appeals the 24-month sentence imposed after revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand for resentencing. English contends that the district court erred by concluding that he committed a Grade A violation of his supervised release under U.S.S.G. § 7B1.1 (policy statement). Specifically, Engl
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005-02-11 · Published · cited 39× · 400 F.3d 273; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2253; 2005 WL 327464
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: ■ Jake Anthony English, who was previously convicted of possession of stolen mail and forgery, appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release. Specifically, he.argues that: 1) the district court did not have jurisdiction to revoke because it was based on an invalid arrest warrant; 2) the warrant did not permit the district court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999-03-12 · Published · cited 0× · 176 F.3d 491; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 14359; 1999 WL 147614
176 F.3d 491 U.S.v.English* NO. 96-6702 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. March 12, 1999 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ala. , No.93-00291-CR-AR-E 2
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997-09-29 · Published · cited 12× · 47 M.J. 215; 1997 CAAF LEXIS 83; 1997 WL 716220
Opinion of the Court EFFRON, Judge: Contrary to his pleas at a special court-martial, appellant was convicted of attempted malingering, failure to go to his appointed place of duty, and malingering, in violation of Articles 80, 86, and 115, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 880, 886, and 915, respectively. The military judge, sitting alone, sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, co
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997-09-15 · Published · cited 0× · 127 F.3d 39; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 29005; 1997 WL 613325
127 F.3d 39 U.S.v.English* NO. 96-6973 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept 15, 1997 Appeal From: S.D.Ala. ,No.9300138CR1 1 Affirmed.
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996-04-19 · Published · cited 0× · 44 M.J. 612; 1996 CCA LEXIS 163; 1996 WL 281708
LUCAS, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by special court-martial, military judge alone, of attempted malingering, fail*613ure to go to his appointed place of duty, and malingering, in violation of Articles 80, 86, and 115, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 886, and 915 respectively. We have examined the rec
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 85 F.3d 644; 1996 WL 252522
85 F.3d 644 U.S.v.English* NO. 95-6226 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit May 07, 1996 Appeal From: S.D.Ala., No. 93-00138-CR-1 1 AFFIRMED AND REVERSED.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995-08-14 · Published · cited 0× · 65 F.3d 181; 1995 WL 500057
65 F.3d 181 U.S.v.English* NO. 93-9168 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Aug 14, 1995 Appeal From: N.D.Ga., No. 93-00199-1-CR-1 1 AFFIRMED.
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993-08-19 · Published · cited 0× · 37 M.J. 1107; 1993 CMR LEXIS 391; 1993 WL 362316
ORR, Senior Judge: Consistent with his pleas pursuant to a pretrial agreement, the appellant was convicted of an attempt to steal and eight separate thefts involving the taking of a charge card, four checks, and a total of $1812.20 in violation, respectively, of Articles 80 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 921. He also pled guilty to four separate incidents alleging forgery of the four stolen chec
District Court, D. Hawaii · 1991-09-09 · Published · cited 1× · 777 F. Supp. 791; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16685; 1991 WL 238747
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TASHIMA, District Judge, sitting by designation. These cases require the court to revisit the issue of jury selection by a magistrate in a felony trial.1 These are two motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 by two defendants in the same underlying criminal case to vacate their convictions because jury selection in their case was conducted b
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 917 F.2d 561; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19051; 1990 WL 160511
917 F.2d 561 U.S.v.English* NO. 90-3137 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. OCT 04, 1990 1 Appeal From: E.D.La. 2
U S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988-01-22 · Published · cited 0× · 25 M.J. 819; 1988 WL 9530
DECISION LEWIS, Judge: Pursuant to his pleas the appellant was found guilty of forgery in violation of Article 123, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C.A. § 923, and six specifications of uttering worthless checks in violation of Article 123a, U.C. M.J., 10 U.S.C.A. § 923a. A military judge, sitting alone, imposed a sentence including a bad conduct discharge, confinement for two years and reduction to airman basic. This sent