Cases

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4496 Doc: 87 Filed: 06/07/2024 Pg: 1 of 36 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4496 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. EL SHAFEE ELSHEIKH, Defendant – Appellant.

*518SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Kwame El appeals from a March 24, 2008 judgment of conviction of the District Court sentencing him principally to four years’ probation, including six months’ home confinement after defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of corruptly endeavoring to obstruct and impede the due administration of the Internal Revenue laws, in violation of

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Essam Helmi El Shami appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stat

*518SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Kwame El appeals from a March 24, 2008 judgment of conviction of the District Court sentencing him principally to four years’ probation, including six months’ home confinement after defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of corruptly endeavoring to obstruct and impede the due administration of the Internal Revenue laws, in violation of

OPINION WALLACE, Circuit Judge: The United States of America (government) entered into a consent decree with El Dorado County (County) concerning the clean up of an abandoned landfill located near Lake Tahoe in California. The County shortly thereafter moved to modify the decree, and the district court suspended the decree pending further hearings. The government appealed. The County later moved to dis

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , No. 11-17134 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:01-cv-01520- MCE-GGH EL DORADO COUNTY , California and CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, Defendants-Appellees. OPINION Appe

MEMORANDUM ** Visa El appeals from the 6-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for misprision of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. El contends that the district court’s discussion of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors was inadequate. We disagree. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S

583 F.3d 576 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Rahmaan Manzar El HERMAN, Appellant. No. 08-3422. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 13, 2009. Filed: October 8, 2009. *577 R. Scott Rhinehart, argued, Sioux City, IA, for appellant. Shawn Wehde, AUSA, argued, Sioux City

574 F.3d 915 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malik Al Mustafa EL-ALAMIN, also known as Eric Britten, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3774. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 14, 2008. Filed: August 4, 2009. *920 Thomas Harold Shiah, argued, Kimberly K. Hall, on

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. $40,955.00 IN UNITED No. 07-55860 STATES CURRENCY, Defendant.  D.C. No. CV-05-01901-DMS OPINION BASEL EL FARRA, FATIMA EL FARRA, and RAWIA EL

OPINION OF THE COURT CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant Mohammed El Amin pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). In the agreement and in open court prior to sentencing, El Amin ac*76knowledged that he faced at least fifteen years imprisonment. Nonetheless, he now argues that he should be r

417 F.Supp.2d 75 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Osama El-Sayed Abdalla El-SILIMY, M.D. and the Aroostook E.N.T. Clinic, P.A. No. CR-04-63-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. March 2, 2006. *76 Donald E. Clark, Office of the U.S. Attorney, District of Maine, Portland, ME, James M. Moore, Office of the U.S. Attorney, D

434 F.3d 659 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Essam Helmi EL SHAMI, a/k/a Essam Hamed Elshami, a/k/a Sam Helmi, a/k/a Helmy Asam, a/k/a Shamy Asam, a/k/a Sam Helmy Shamy, a/k/a El Shami Essam, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-4662. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued October 28, 2005. Decided December 27, 2005.

WIDENER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The majority correctly identifies the facts relevant to El Shami’s motion to dismiss Count One of the indictment, which tend to show that El Shami did not receive notice of his deportation proceeding. But the majority errs in applying to these facts the rules for collateral attack on a deportation order under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) and United States v. Mendoza-Lopez, 481

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ PRETRIAL MOTIONS DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge. The defendants have filed motions for a bill of particulars, to compel production of certain evidence, to extend the time for filing motions to suppress and to dismiss, to strike surplusage from the indictment and to exclude certain evidence. I deny the motions. I. Bill of Par

373 F.Supp.2d 574 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Sa'ad EL-AMIN. No. CRIM 3:03CR55. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. May 9, 2005. *575 Robert E. Trono, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Gregg R. Nivala, Richmond, VA, for United States of America. Paul Geoffrey Gill, Robert James Wagner, Office

ORDER Luay El-Abed pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess and distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). He was sen*715tenced to the mandatory minimum of 60 months, 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B). He appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court miscalculated his criminal history score and thus concluded incorrectly that he was ineli

268 F.Supp.2d 639 (2003) UNITED STATES of America v. Sa'Ad EL-AMIN, Defendant. No. CRIM. 3:03CR55. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. June 20, 2003. Robert E. Trono, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Gregg R. Nivala, United States Attorney's Office, Richmond, VA, for Plaintiff. Paul Geoffrey Gill, Robert James Wagner, Office of the Fed

SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,

133 F.Supp.2d 600 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Grabshawi Kamal EL-SADIG, aka Gabshawi Kamal El-Sadig, Defendant. No. 1:2000-CR-0520. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 1, 2001. *601 Geoffrey Simonson Mearns, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant. Joseph P.