Cases

117 F.3d 1428 97 CJ C.A.R. 1172 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge. This case involves questions of federal income tax accounting and return treatment of a rancher’s breeding cattle for the calendar years 1954, 1955 and 1956. 1 In the center of the controversy are (a) the 1954 Internal Revenue Code’s § 1231 (b) (3),

762 So.2d 226 (2000) Clifford SPILLER and Curtis Spiller v. Gunnar S. EKBERG and Southern United Fire Insurance Company. No. 00-CA-130. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. May 17, 2000. *227 Rodney Kelp Littlefield, Metairie, Louisiana, Attorney for Defendants-Appellants, Gunnar Ekberg and Southern United Fire Insurance

Howell, Judge, delivered the opinion of the Court: Plaintiff sues for damages and “just compensation” for his alleged illegal imprisonment in the custody of the defendant. The defendant has demurred to the petition on the ground that it does not state a cause of action. On this ground the demurrer must be sustained. Plaintiff’s petition in forma pauperis makes the following allega

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order denying a motion under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. following section 687, for correction of an allegedly illegal sentence. ■ *382On April 22, 1942, an indictment was filed in the United States District Court for Puert

Per Curiam: The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the petition for *971writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that the cause is moot. Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief were

C. A. 9th Cir. Certi*953orari granted. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, and Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General, for petitioners. Respondent pro se.

Certiorari denied.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1087 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSE VÁZQUEZ-ROSARIO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Pedro A. Delgado-Hernández, U.S. District Judge]

Motion for leave to file -petition for writ of habeas Gorpús denied.

OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge. Before the court is plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and defendant’s motion for summary dismissal of a pro se complaint (“motion for summary dismissal”).1 Defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), to dismiss the complaint because plai

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion to dismiss a claim for damages for unjust conviction under RCFC 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, under RCFC 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim for relief and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment on liability. The issues for decision are w

356 B.R. 263 (2006) In re Jeffrey C. HAMM and Honie Sue Hamm, Debtors. Jeffrey C. Hamm and Honie Sue Hamm, Plaintiffs, v. United States of America, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-24225-BKC-JKO, Adversary No. 05-2370-BKC-JKO-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Ft. Lauderdale Division. November 22, 2006. *264

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-1919 Julie L. Pfeiffer, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Dale R. Pfeiffer, Appellant, vs. Allina Health System, d/b/a Allina Hospitals & Clinics Behavioral Healt

ORDER MILLER, Judge. Presenting the issue whether plaintiff is entitled to pay and allowances for the period during which action on his court-martial sentence was set aside, even though his conviction was not disturbed, this case is before the court after briefing on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(4) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to RCFC 56. Argumen

USCA1 Opinion [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 96-1808 UNITED STATES, Appellee,

• DENMAN, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the district court refusing to allow appellant Ekberg to file, in forma pauperis, an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court found that the applicant, a prisoner confined on a conviction of felony in the state courts of California, had exhausted his state remedies and that the Supreme Court of the United States, 339 U.S. 969, 70 S.Ct. 988, 94 L.Ed.

94 Cal.App.2d 613 (1949) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JAMES NELS EKBERG, Appellant. Crim. No. 728. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist. Nov. 14, 1949. James Nels Ekberg, in pro. per., for Appellant. Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, and Norman H. Sokolow, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. BARNARD, P. J. The defendant was charged