Cases

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the appeal is DISMISSED. Defendant-Appellant Anthony Henry (“Henry”) pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 28 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and (b)(1)(B). The district court sentenced Henry principally to 72 months’ imprisonment. Henry appeals his sente

(2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Stafford EASTERLING, Defendant. No. 1:96-cr-00002-MP. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division. May 6, 2008. ORDER MAURICE M. PAUL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on its own motion, under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), regarding whether, based on Amendments 70

ORDER MARY BECK BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Defendant John David Easterling seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) in order to challenge the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because Easterling has failed to make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Defendant John Easterling appeals his jury conviction for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (possession of a firearm after being convicted of a felony) and the 235 month sentence imposed. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. *203I.</

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1143 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER EASTERLING, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH OCT 7 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

91 F.3d 161 U.S.v.Easterling* NO. 94-3465 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. June 28, 1996 1 Appeal From: M.D.Fla., No. 94-00071-CR-J-10

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: Appellants Easterling, Ciniglio, Pregno, Sexton, Gober and Vieau appeal their conviction for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and § 1955. Appellants’ primary allegations of error relate to the district court’s denial of their motion to suppress telephone conversations intercepted via electronic surveillance conducted by Government agents. Each of these allegations is without merit. Thus, the Government did not violate

751 F.2d 380 U.S.v.Easterling (Gene Claude) NO. 83-5233 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth circuit. DEC 14, 1984 1 Appeal From: D.S.C. 2 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Clifton R. Jessup, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge This Adversary Proceeding came before the Court on November 14, 2018 for trial upon the Amended Complaint for Determination of Dischargeability and Objection to Discharge filed by Gil and Patricia Madsen (collectively, the "Plaintiffs") against Micah and Alexanderia Easterling (collectively, the "Defendants"). The issues before the Court arise out of the sale of a Nestle Toll H

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

537 U.S. 916 EASTERLINGv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-5445. Supreme Court of United States. October 7, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. 2 C.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.