Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 22-404 (JEB) ISREAL EASTERDAY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Isreal Easterday was a member of the crowd that stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. On October 26, 2023, a jury found him guilty of nine co

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 22-404 (JEB) ISREAL EASTERDAY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Isreal Easterday was a member of the crowd that stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. He is charged with multiple criminal counts related to such con

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 07-10347 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-05-00150-CRB JACK E. EASTERDAY, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 07-10347 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-05-00150-CRB JACK E. EASTERDAY, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED  OPINION Appeal from the

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In this case, I find myself between “the proverbial rock and a hard place.” I can either adhere to precedent (with which I do not agree) or I can join the majority and try to overrule bad circuit precedent. Although I agree that United States v. Poll, 521 F.2d 329 (9th Cir.1975) is bad law, Poll is the controlling law of this circuit and I understand a

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In this case, I find myself between “the proverbial rock and a hard place.” I can either adhere to precedent (with which I do not agree) or I can join the majority and try to overrule bad circuit precedent. Although I agree that United States v. Poll, 521 F.2d 329 (9th Cir.1975) is bad law, Poll is the controlling law of this circuit and I understand a

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

*912 OPINION BY LAZARUS, J.: ' These are cross-appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Orphans’ Court Division, adjudicating the rights of the parties with respect to pension and insurance benefits payable as a result of the death of M

57 F.2d 165 (1932) UNITED STATES v. EASTERDAY et al. No. 314. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. April 4, 1932. Boardman Wright, of New York City, for all appellants. I. Nicholas Gordon, of New York City, for Easterday. Solomon Badesch, of New York City, for Harry Greenhaus. Benjamin F. Fanger, of New York City, for Charles H. Greenhaus.<

2020 IL App (2d) 190879 No. 2-19-0879 Opinion filed December 7, 2020 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT DANIEL D. EASTERDAY, ILLINOIS STATE ) Appeal from the Circuit Court RIFLE ASSOCIATION, and SECOND ) of Lake County. AMENDMEN

2020 IL App (2d) 190879 No. 2-19-0879 Opinion filed December 4, 2020 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ DANIEL D. EASTERDAY, ILLINOI

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest Illinois Official Reports to the accuracy

JUSTICE DONOHUE *333In these cross-appeals, we consider two issues of first impression. The first issue involves the impact of a pending divorce action on a spouse's entitlement to life insurance benefits, and specifically the interplay between provisions of the Divorce Code, 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 3301 - 3904, the Probate, Estates, and Fiduciaries Code

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

GRATTON, Judge. Ashli Marie Easterday appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion to suppress evidence found in the search of her purse. The district court determined that Easterday’s purse was not a part of her person at the time probable cause to search her vehicle was established, and therefore, it was a container in the vehicle and subject to search pursuant t

COLE, Chief Judge. When Congress speaks clearly, administrative agencies must listen. Congress spoke clearly in the 2008 Farm Bill when it said "an entity that was approved" to provide rebates to its members may continue to do so "in a manner consistent with the payment plan approved." But an agency, under the guise of interpretation, nevertheless imposed additional eligibility requirem

ORDER James G. Carr, Sr. U.S. District Judge This declaratory judgment action under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 concerns a farming coop*852erative’s right to issue “patronage rebates” to those of its members who buy crop insurance from an insurer that the cooperative partly owns. The plaintiff, Sunxise Cooperative, Inc. (Sunrise), is an Ohi

101 F.3d 709 Easterdayv.Gilbert* NO. 96-2648 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Nov 05, 1996 1 Appeal From: N.D.Fla., No. 93-30628-CIV-LAC; Appealing after remand 38 F.3d 639