Cases

*682OPINION By the Court, Becker, J.: Appellant Felipe Dzul pleaded guilty, pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford,1 to one count of attempted lewdness with a child under the age of fourteen years for grabbing and squeezing *683the breast area

DECISION Plaintiffs appeal Defendant's Notice of Deficiency Assessment, issued September 14, 2010, denying Plaintiffs' dependent exemptions claimed for the 2009 tax year. A trial was held in the Oregon Tax Courtroom, Salem, Oregon, on September 14, 2011. Plaintiffs were represented by Gary DeFrang and Bernard Chamberland. Plaintiff Russell Nah-Dzul (Russell) appeared and testified with the assistance of a Spanish languag

Opinion by JUDGE DAILEY ¶ 1 Defendant, Franklyn J. Whitlock, appeals the judgments of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of sexual assault on a child and sexual assault on a child by one in a position of trust. He also appeals the denial of probation. We affirm. I. Background ¶ 2 The victim's mother, D.Q., married defendant when the victim was six months old. When the vic

JUSTICE GABRIEL delivered the Opinion of the Court. 1 In this original proceeding, the People challenge the district court's order denying the probation department's complaint to revoke Bryan Roberson's sex offender intensive supervision probation ("SOISP"), As pertinent here, the People sought to revoke Roberson's probation because he, among other things, allegedly failed to participate actively in a sex

JUSTICE LYTTON delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, Howard Hillier, was charged with predatory criminal sexual assault of a child (720 ILCS 5/12 — 14.1(a)(1) (West 2006)). The trial court found defendant guilty. Before sentencing, the trial court ordered defendant to participate in a sex offender evaluation. The trial court

OPINION KELLY, Judge. ¶ 1 In this appeal from her conviction and sentence for luring a minor for sexual exploitation, entered after a jury trial, Susan Hernandez argues the trial court erred in sentencing her to a mitigated, two-year prison term rather than suspending her sentence

255 P.3d 262 (2011) Pedro AGUILAR-RAYGOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 54667. Supreme Court of Nevada. June 2, 2011. *263 Jeremy T. Bosler, Public Defender, and Cheryl Bond, Deputy Public Defender, Washoe County, for Appellant. Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General, Carson City; Richard A. Gammick

The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado 2 East 14th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80203

131 Nev., Advance Opinion 62- IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DOMINIC SANTINO CASSINELLI, No. 64881 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, AUG 2 7 2015 Respondent.

WATERMAN, Justice. In this appeal, we must decide whether the sentencing court improperly penalized *652the defendant for invoking his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. We conclude that when the district court asks the defendant a question at sentencing and then imposes an adverse sentencing consequence unrelated to any legitimate penological purpose o

138 P.3d 477 (2006) Angelo PANTANO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 43426. Supreme Court of Nevada. July 20, 2006. *479 Philip J. Kohn, Public Defender, and Mark S. Blaskey and Jordan S. Savage, Deputy Public Defenders, Clark County, for Appellant. George Chanos, Attorney General, Carson City; David J. R

115 S.W.3d 1 (2003) Phillip Arthur CHAPMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. 2011/12-02. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. September 10, 2003. *2 Edgar A. Mason, Dallas, for Appellant. Patricia Poppoff Noble, Asst. DA, Dallas, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State. OPINION COC

MANSFIELD, Justice. The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, “No person ... shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” According to section 903A.2(l)(a) (2007) of the Iowa Code, an incarcerated sex offender is not eligible for an earned-time reduction of sentence unless that person completes a sex offender treatment program. The question presented here is whether section 90

DAVID, Justice. In this case, a parolee convicted of a sex crime against an adult female challenges a number of his parole conditions, including several that prohibit him from having contact with children — even his own. He also challenges the constitutionality of a state treatment program for sex offenders that he must participate in as part of his parole, claiming that under the program he is required to provide self-incri

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 29, 2008 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MUSTAPHA BOUTCHICHE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 80258 Richard R. Baumgartner, Judge No. E2007-00473-CCA-R3-CD- Filed January 12, 2009 The defendant, Mustapha Boutchiche, was convicted of sexual battery, a Class E fe

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 09–0982 Filed July 8, 2011 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff, vs. IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WEBSTER COUNTY, Defendant, ------------------------------------------------------------------ ROBERT HARKINS, Plaintiff, vs. IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WEBSTER COUNTY, Defendant. Certiorari to the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Kurt L. Wilke

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES Daniel G. McNamara Gregory F. Zoeller Patrick L. Proctor Attorney General of Indiana Fort Wayne, Indiana David A. Arthur Stephanie L. Rothenberg Deputy Attorneys General Indianapolis, I

132 Nev., Advance Opinion 2.3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DEANGELO R. CARROLL, No. 64757 Appellant, vs. FILE THE STATE OF NEVADA, APR 0 7 2016 Respondent.

132 Nev., Advance Opinion 2.3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DEANGELO R. CARROLL, No. 64757 Appellant, vs. FILE THE STATE OF NEVADA, APR 0 7 2016 Respondent.

131 Nev., Advance Opinion 62- IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DOMINIC SANTINO CASSINELLI, No. 64881 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, AUG 2 7 2015 Respondent.