Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Dunford”
United States v. Dunfordpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JONES, District Judge. In this criminal prosecution for trafficking in counterfeit goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320, the defendant has filed motions to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant and pursuant to consent-to-search forms. The defendant argues that the searches of his person, trailers, and stalls located on the premises (“Market”) of the Farmer’
United States v. Douglas Lee Dunford, Sr.public domain
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Judge DIANA ' GRIBBON MOTZ joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: Douglas Lee Dunford was convicted, on fourteen counts for the illegal possession of six firearms and ammunition seized from his house
Dunford v. American DataBank, LLCpublic domain
ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION WILLIAM ALSUP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE INTRODUCTION In.this putative class action involving the Fair Credit Reporting Act, plaintiff moves to certify two classes under Rule 23(b)(3) seeking statutory penalties for willful violations. Defendant moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, ■
In Re Dunfordpublic domain
408 B.R. 489 (2009) In re Monica J. DUNFORD, Debtor. No. 09 B 09879. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 21, 2009. *490 David S. Yen, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. Tom Vaughn, Chapter 13 Trustee. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON DEBTOR'S MOTION TO RESET CMI DATE AND TRUS
Stephenson v. Dunfordpublic domain
320 F.Supp.2d 44 (2004) Lester STEPHENSON, Plaintiff, v. DUNFORD, et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-6509L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 10, 2004. *45 Lester Stephenson, Coxsackie, NY, pro se. Philip G. Spellane, Harris Beach LLP, Pittsford, NY, for Plaintiff. Emil J. Bove, Jr., Office of New York Sta
Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. The Endangered Species Act directs the Secretary of the Interior, upon listing a species as endangered, to also designate the "critical habitat" of the species. A group of landowners whose property was designated as critical habitat for an endangered frog challenged the designation. The landowners urge that their land cannot be
Dunford v. Virginiapublic domain
Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.
Dunford v. Rolly Marine Service Co.public domain
OMNIBUS ORDER TORRES, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order Regarding Deposition of Joanne Rocks [D.E. *63697], Plaintiffs Motion to Compel an Independent Medical Examination of Joanne Rocks To Determine her Competency for Deposition and Motion to Appoint a Special
Joseph C. Dunford v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence under an indictment charging violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act, 26 U.S.C. § 2554. Appellant is! a physician. He was convicted on thé testimony of three government agents who, pretending to be narcotic addicts,, obtained from him prescriptions enabling them to purcha
192 P.3d 543 (2008) UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE CO.; Commonwealth Insurance Co.; Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc.; and Core-Mark International, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SONITROL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, n/k/a Sonitrol Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. and Core-Mark International, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sonitrol Management Corporation, n/k/a Sonitrol Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dunfordpublic domain
KLEIN, J. The insurer, which does not issue policies in Florida, insured a Virginia vehicle which was involved in an accident in Florida. The estate of a person killed in the accident obtained a judgment for more than the policy limits against the insureds, and the insureds filed this bad faith action against the insurer. The insurer asserts on this appeal that it is not subject to long-arm jurisdiction in Florida, but we disagr
Dunford v. Piercepublic domain
956 F.2d 277 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Ho
Ronnie J. Dunford v. Steve Hargettpublic domain
153 F.3d 726 23 CJ C.A.R. 3849 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,
United States v. Eric Hendersonpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-4235 Doc: 41 Filed: 12/13/2023 Pg: 1 of 9 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4235 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ERIC HENDERSON, Defendant - A
United States v. Darrin Millerpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4397 Doc: 37 Filed: 03/06/2023 Pg: 1 of 11 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4397 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DARRIN ALONZO MILLER, Defendant – Appellee.
United States v. Alexander Smithpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-4414 Doc: 72 Filed: 12/01/2022 Pg: 1 of 40 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-4414 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff − Appellee, v. ALEXANDER SAMUEL SMITH, a/k/a Amir Alexander,
United States v. Joshua Grantpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0229p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Appellee, │
Joyner v. United Statespublic domain
FINAL ORDER REBECCA BEACH SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before, the court on the Petitioner’s pro se Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (“§ 2255 Motion”), filed on December 10, 2015. ECF No. 99. On December 15, 2015, the court ordered the § 2255 proceeding stayed, pending authorization from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for the Petiti
United States v. Washingtonpublic domain
ORDER Jarvis Washington was convicted by a jury of two separate counts under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for being a felon in possession of a gun and ammunition. He complains on appeal that the district court failed to instruct the jury that it could riot return separate convictions unless it concluded that Washington stored the gun and ammunition at different times or in different places. No such evidence exists, according to Washington; w
United States v. Bronsteinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge As James Madison observed long ago, “no language is so- copious as to supply words and phrases for every complex idea, or so correct as not to include many equivocally denoting different ideas.” The Federalist No. 47, at 225 (James Madison) (C. Rossiter ed., 1963). Legislatures at all levels have powerfully confirmed Madison’s insight. Yet e