⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Dunford”

District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1997-11-05 · Published · cited 1× · 983 F. Supp. 658; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17405; 1997 WL 693267
OPINION AND ORDER JONES, District Judge. In this criminal prosecution for trafficking in counterfeit goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320, the defendant has filed motions to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant and pursuant to consent-to-search forms. The defendant argues that the searches of his person, trailers, and stalls located on the premises (“Market”) of the Farmer’
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998-07-02 · Published · cited 131× · 148 F.3d 385; 49 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 836; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 14921; 1998 WL 354530
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Judge DIANA ' GRIBBON MOTZ joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: Douglas Lee Dunford was convicted, on fourteen counts for the illegal possession of six firearms and ammunition seized from his house
District Court, N.D. California · 2014-08-12 · Published · cited 4× · 64 F. Supp. 3d 1378; 2014 WL 3956774; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111761
ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION WILLIAM ALSUP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE INTRODUCTION In.this putative class action involving the Fair Credit Reporting Act, plaintiff moves to certify two classes under Rule 23(b)(3) seeking statutory penalties for willful violations. Defendant moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, ■
In Re Dunfordpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009-07-21 · Published · cited 5× · 408 B.R. 489; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 1938; 2009 WL 2185634
408 B.R. 489 (2009) In re Monica J. DUNFORD, Debtor. No. 09 B 09879. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 21, 2009. *490 David S. Yen, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. Tom Vaughn, Chapter 13 Trustee. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON DEBTOR'S MOTION TO RESET CMI DATE AND TRUS
District Court, W.D. New York · 2004-05-10 · Published · cited 0× · 320 F. Supp. 2d 44; 2004 WL 1056047
320 F.Supp.2d 44 (2004) Lester STEPHENSON, Plaintiff, v. DUNFORD, et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-6509L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 10, 2004. *45 Lester Stephenson, Coxsackie, NY, pro se. Philip G. Spellane, Harris Beach LLP, Pittsford, NY, for Plaintiff. Emil J. Bove, Jr., Office of New York Sta
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-11-27 · Published · cited 144× · 586 U.S. 9; 139 S. Ct. 361; 202 L. Ed. 2d 269; 2018 U.S. LEXIS 6932
Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. The Endangered Species Act directs the Secretary of the Interior, upon listing a species as endangered, to also designate the "critical habitat" of the species. A group of landowners whose property was designated as critical habitat for an endangered frog challenged the designation. The landowners urge that their land cannot be
Dunford v. Virginiapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1965-05-17 · Published · cited 0× · 381 U.S. 917
Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005-12-01 · Published · cited 23× · 233 F.R.D. 635; 63 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 777; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39569; 2005 WL 3671908
OMNIBUS ORDER TORRES, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order Regarding Deposition of Joanne Rocks [D.E. *63697], Plaintiffs Motion to Compel an Independent Medical Examination of Joanne Rocks To Determine her Competency for Deposition and Motion to Appoint a Special
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954-10-14 · Published · cited 1× · 216 F.2d 184; 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2946
PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence under an indictment charging violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act, 26 U.S.C. § 2554. Appellant is! a physician. He was convicted on thé testimony of three government agents who, pretending to be narcotic addicts,, obtained from him prescriptions enabling them to purcha
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008-07-24 · Published · cited 17× · 192 P.3d 543; 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 1172; 2008 WL 2837540
192 P.3d 543 (2008) UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE CO.; Commonwealth Insurance Co.; Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc.; and Core-Mark International, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SONITROL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, n/k/a Sonitrol Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. and Core-Mark International, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sonitrol Management Corporation, n/k/a Sonitrol Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004-05-26 · Published · cited 0× · 877 So. 2d 22; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7343; 2004 WL 1161819
KLEIN, J. The insurer, which does not issue policies in Florida, insured a Virginia vehicle which was involved in an accident in Florida. The estate of a person killed in the accident obtained a judgment for more than the policy limits against the insureds, and the insureds filed this bad faith action against the insurer. The insurer asserts on this appeal that it is not subject to long-arm jurisdiction in Florida, but we disagr
Dunford v. Piercepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992-02-05 · Published · cited 0× · 956 F.2d 277; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 10161; 1992 WL 19844
956 F.2d 277 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Ho
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998-07-14 · Published · cited 0× · 153 F.3d 726; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 25771; 1998 WL 396586
153 F.3d 726 23 CJ C.A.R. 3849 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023-12-13 · Published · cited 5× · 88 F.4th 534
USCA4 Appeal: 21-4235 Doc: 41 Filed: 12/13/2023 Pg: 1 of 9 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4235 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ERIC HENDERSON, Defendant - A
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023-03-06 · Published · cited 7× · 61 F.4th 426
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4397 Doc: 37 Filed: 03/06/2023 Pg: 1 of 11 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4397 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DARRIN ALONZO MILLER, Defendant – Appellee.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-12-01 · Published · cited 18× · 54 F.4th 755
USCA4 Appeal: 20-4414 Doc: 72 Filed: 12/01/2022 Pg: 1 of 40 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-4414 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff − Appellee, v. ALEXANDER SAMUEL SMITH, a/k/a Amir Alexander,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021-10-01 · Published · cited 25× · 15 F.4th 452
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0229p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Appellee, │
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 263 F. Supp. 3d 629
FINAL ORDER REBECCA BEACH SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before, the court on the Petitioner’s pro se Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (“§ 2255 Motion”), filed on December 10, 2015. ECF No. 99. On December 15, 2015, the court ordered the § 2255 proceeding stayed, pending authorization from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for the Petiti
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 666 F. App'x 544
ORDER Jarvis Washington was convicted by a jury of two separate counts under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for being a felon in possession of a gun and ammunition. He complains on appeal that the district court failed to instruct the jury that it could riot return separate convictions unless it concluded that Washington stored the gun and ammunition at different times or in different places. No such evidence exists, according to Washington; w
District Court, District of Columbia · 2015-12-22 · Published · cited 0× · 151 F. Supp. 3d 31; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170740; 2015 WL 9412106
MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge As James Madison observed long ago, “no language is so- copious as to supply words and phrases for every complex idea, or so correct as not to include many equivocally denoting different ideas.” The Federalist No. 47, at 225 (James Madison) (C. Rossiter ed., 1963). Legislatures at all levels have powerfully confirmed Madison’s insight. Yet e