Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “United States v. Dinzey”
United States v. Markpublic domain
GÓMEZ, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 20, 2009) On February 20, 2009, defendant Leon Boodoo (“Boodoo”) filed a motion for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29 (“Rule 29”), or in the alternative, for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 (“Rule 33”). In the motion, Boodoo requested an extension of time within
United States v. Markpublic domain
GOMEZ, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (February 23, 2007) Before the Court are the suppression motions of defendants Gelean Mark (“Mark”), Vernon Fagan (“Fagan”), Alan Dinzey (“Dinzey”), Keith Francois (“Francois”), Alexei Emmanuel (“Emmanuel”), Dave Blyden (“Blyden”), Tyrone Alexander Prince (“Prince”), Royd Thompson (“Thompson”) and Leon Boodoo (“Boodoo”) (the “defendants”).
United States v. Moore-Bushpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 19-1582 19-1625 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. NIA MOORE-BUSH, a/k/a Nia Dinzey, Defendant, Appellee. Nos. 19-1583 19-1626 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. DAPHNE MOORE
United States v. Moore-Bushpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 19-1582 19-1625 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. NIA MOORE-BUSH, a/k/a Nia Dinzey, Defendant, Appellee. Nos. 19-1583 19-1626 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. DAPHNE MOO
United States v. Alvinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM SCHILLER, District Judge. Irving Alvin and George Duffy face charges of conspiracy to commit bank robbery, attempted bank robbery, carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, being felons in possession of a weapon, and aiding and abetting the commission of those crimes. The joint trial against both Defendants has commenced twice and ended in mistrial both times. On March 1
Constant v. Pennsylvania Department of Correctionspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION CYNTHIA REED EDDY, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION For the reasons set forth below, Edward Constant’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus will be denied in part and granted in part. A. Double Jeopardy And Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Federal habeas relief is not warranted on petitioner’s claim that trial cou
OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judgei After twelve years of litigation in this First Amendment case involving the rights *342of Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Court is at a crossroad regarding a widely-debated question of Puerto Rico real property law. Are roads in gated urbanizations of private or