Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Rodrigo Diaz-Lopez appeals from the 72-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment. Diaz-Lopez contends that the district court improperly considered certain personal characteristics at

625 F.3d 1198 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Miguel DIAZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-50604. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted August 31, 2010.[*] Filed November 9, 2010. *1199 Karen P. Hewitt, United States Attorney, Bruce R. Castetter, Thomas

MEMORANDUM ** Rodrigo Diaz-Lopez appeals from the 72-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment. Diaz-Lopez contends that the district court improperly considered certain personal characteristics at

*1230Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Same case below, 625 F.3d 1198.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 13-2113 13-2118 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ LÓPEZ-DÍAZ; CARLOS LÓPEZ-DÍAZ, Defendants, Appellants. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

MEMORANDUM ** Ramiro Lopez-Diaz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the revocation of supervised release and the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Lopez-Diaz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Pending before the Court is defendant Jose Lopez Diaz’s motion for a judgment of acquittal and for a new trial, (Docket No. 350), defendant Carlos Lopez Diaz’s motion for a judgment of acquittal, (Docket No. 351), and defendant Carlos Lopez Diaz’s motion for a new trial, (Docket No. 352). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES both defendants’ motion for a

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 27, 2012, the government filed a notice of intent to present material against the defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) (“Rule 404(b)”). (Docket No. 209.) The government seeks to introduce (1) billing claims submitted by defendant Jose Lopez-Diaz for medical services that were allegedly not ren

*122OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant Carlos Lopez-Diaz’s [2] Motion to Suppress (Docket No. 101), and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) advising the Court to deny said motion (Docket No. 122). For the reasons stated below, the Court ADOPTS the Report, and accordingly,

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Same case below, 406 Fed. Appx. 448.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM** Martin Lopez-Diaz appeals his conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States without permission in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm his conviction. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we will not recount it here. I Lopez-Diaz contends that his underlying deportation, effected unde

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

CHOY, Circuit Judge: Raymond Lopez-Diaz appeals from his conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a), 18 U.S.C. § 2. He contends that incriminating *663statements made after his arrest were elicited in violation of his Miranda rights. We reverse. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS On Dece

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER1 BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court are respondents Ana Lopez, the warden of the Bayamon Detention Center, and the attorney general of Puerto Rico’s (“respondents”) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, (Docket No. 77), and respondents’ motion in compliance with the Court’s order to show cause, (Docket No. 83). For the following