Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF ) ONE DIGITAL DEVICE CURRENTLY ) LOCATED AT 601 4TH STREET NW, ) No. 24-sw-91 (GMH) WASHINGTON, DC UNDER RULE 41 ) __________________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

641 F.2d 1289 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.An Article of Device Consisting of One DEVICE, More or Less,LABELED in Part: (front) "THERAMATIC", DefendantandDr. Ralph B. Cloward, Claimant-Appellant. No. 78-2998. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. March 30, 1981. James M. S

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1019C (Filed Under Seal: May 20, 2021) (Reissued: June 4, 2021)* FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** PLAINTIFF NO. 1, * * Plaintiff, * * v.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1874 ___________________________ Julie Sprafka lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Medical Device Business Services, Inc., an Indiana Corporation, formerly known

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves to dismiss the appeal of A-l Amusement Co., Inc. et al. (A-l Amusement) as untimely. A-l Amusement opposes. The United States replies. A-l Amusement moves to consolidate this case with other pending appeals. The United States opposes. A-l Amusement replies. A-l Amusement sued the United States in the Court of Federal Claims. Cou

607 F.Supp. 990 (1985) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AN ARTICLE OF DEVICE CONSISTING OF 1,217 CARDBOARD BOXES, more or less, each containing an individually packaged unit in a tube packaged in a blister-pack with an insert labeled in part as follows: (box) "*** stryker *** A0931660404261C *** B311001c ***", (tube) "stryker Shoulder 130-10 Dacron * Ligament Prosthesis ***", Defendant. No. K 84-502.</

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1747C (Filed: January 9, 2023) FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** DOE NO. 1, * * Plaintiff, * * v. *

II. DISCUSSION The court's role "in a proceeding to enforce an administrative subpoena is a strictly limited one." FTC v. Texaco, Inc. , 555 F.2d 862, 871-72 (D.C. Cir. 1977). The court is to determine whether " 'the inquiry is within the authority of the agency, the demand is not too indefinite and

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Elizabeth K. Dillon, United States District Judge Plaintiff Susan O. Cardoza is a Virginia resident who alleges that the liner of her hip implant, which was implanted during a total hip replacement, fractured shortly after being implanted, requiring her to have emergent revision surgery. Because some of the fractured pieces could not be removed-in either her first revision surgery or a second revision surgery-she continues to have s

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair. Before the Panel:* Plaintiff in the Northern District of California Gallmann action listed on Schedule A moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Northern District of California or, alterna

885 F.Supp. 1025 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ONE UNLABELED UNIT, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF DEVICE AND PROMOTIONAL BROCHURES, Accompanying Labeling, Labeled in Part: (brochure) "* * * Thor of Genesis I * * * Vibrational Sound Instrument * * * Manufactured by: Chakras Sound Systems, Inc. * * * Richmond Heights, Ohio * * *", Defendant. No. 1:93CV1724. United States District

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *677On November 29, 2017, the Court held an oral hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms of the patents-in-suit. Having considered the parties claim-construction briefing and based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed te

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair Before the Panel:* Plaintiff Associação Brasileira de Medicina de Grupo d/b/a ABRAMGE moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Northern District of Illinois or, alternatively, in the District of Dela

EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge This putative worldwide class action is brought by one hundred and twenty-two Plaintiffs who hale from the fifty states and several U.S. territories as well as multiple foreign countries.1 Plaintiffs allege that, in an effort to fix battery life issues, Apple included code in updates to its mobile operating system (iOS) that significantly reduced the perform

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On August 31, 2015, plaintiff Device Enhancement LLC (“plaintiff’) filed a complaint alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,747,683 (“the ’683 patent”) against defendant Amazon.com Inc. (“defendant”). (D.I. 1) Presently before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss. (D.I. 11) The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U

Opinion concurring in part, dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge Newman. Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge Stoll. Enplas Display Device Corporation appeals the district court's summary judgment that claim 20 of Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.'s ("SSC")

616 F.3d 1309 (2010) Gregory W. BARAN, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEDICAL DEVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and AMT Sverige, AB (Formerly Known As Amedic) and Ascendia AB, Defendants, and Gedon AB and Anders H. Weilandt, Defendants. No. 2010-1058. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. August 12, 2010. Rehearing En Banc Denied

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 15-273 (CKK) UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 11, 2019) Plaintiff

333 F.Supp. 357 (1971) UNITED STATES of America, Libelant, v. An ARTICLE OR DEVICE . . . "HUBBARD ELECTROMETER" or "Hubbard E-Meter," etc., Founding Church of Scientology et al., Claimants. No. D.C. 1-63. United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 30, 1971. *358 John Joseph Matonis, Washington, D. C., for Foundi