Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal involves the jurisdiction of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). A regulation known as the “post-departure bar,” which is codified at 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d), precludes a removed person from filing a motion to reopen immigration proceedings. In Prestol Espinal v. Attorney General,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

OPINION PER CURIAM. Utpal Ajitkumar Desai, a native and citizen of India, was admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident in 1980. On June 4, 2008, Desai was served with a notice to appear alleging that he was subject to removal under INA §§ 237(a)(2)(B)© and 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) for the following offenses: (1) possession of a controlled substance in 2002; and (2) third degree theft in 1994. A

OPINION PER CURIAM. Utpal Ajitkumar Desai, a native and citizen of India, was admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident in 1980. On June 4, 2008, Desai was served with a notice to appear alleging that he was subject to removal under INA §§ 237(a)(2)(B)© and 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) for the following offenses: (1) possession of a controlled substance in 2002; and (2) third degree theft in 1994. A

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

OPINION WILLIAM J. MARTINI, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the Security and Exchange Commissions’ (the “SEC” or the “Government”) motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”). Initiated at the same time as a corresponding criminal complaint, the SEC brought this action against Shreyans Desai (“Desai”), alleging that De

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: December 18, 2020 ********************* KAVITA DESAI, * PUBLISHED * * No. 14-811V Petitioner, * v. * S

Petition for rehearing denied.

520 F.3d 762 (2008) Umang DESAI, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 07-1831. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 30, 2007. Decided March 28, 2008. *763 Shannon M. Shepherd (argued), Azulay, Horn & Seiden, Stanley J. Horn, Horn

282 B.R. 527 (2002) In re Rohit N. DESAI, Debtor. Southwest Georgia Bank, Movant, v. Rohit N. Desai, Respondent. No. 02-10238. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division. July 25, 2002. *528 Walter W. Kelley, Kelley, Lovett & Mullis, P.C., Albany, GA, for Debtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.

[Cite as Desai v. CareSource, Inc., 2024-Ohio-3028.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY NEHA DESAI et al. : : Appellants : C.A. No. 29965 : v.

19-280-pr Davidson v. Desai, et al. In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2019 No. 19-280-pr RONALD DAVIDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UDAY K. DESAI, M.D., CHENG YIN, M.D., HEMAN K. FOWLER, N.P., FLOYD BENNE

STREETT, J. Introduction Bhushan Desai ("Defendant", "Appellant") contends that the Court of Common Pleas (Trial Court) abused its discretion and/or committed legal error by admitting records from the Intoxilyzer calibration logbook through Delaware State Trooper August Zickgraf (Trooper Zickgraf) under D.R.E. 803(6),

Samer v Desai (2020 NY Slip Op 00318) Samer v Desai 2020 NY Slip Op 00318 Decided on January 15, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITIONER’S AMENDED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS MARIANNE O. BATTANI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Jasubhai K. Desai amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he challenges the constitutionality of his 2001 first-degree-murder conviction. Petitioner’s conviction occ

SUBSTITUTE OPINION Tracy Christopher, Justice We deny the motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion from November 3, 2015, and issue this substitute opinion in its place. This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion to .dismiss under the Texas Anti-SLAPP statute.. We conclude that the movant below established h