Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Del Real”
United States v. Del Real-Ordonespublic domain
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Jose G. Del Real-Ordones seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) to challenge the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Defendant’s application for a COA is granted in part and denied in part. Del Real-Ordones was
Del Real v. Dotnetnuke Corp.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Segura-Del Real v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Real-Martinezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Guillermo Del Real-Martinez appeals from his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Martinez’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking
ORDER AND OPINION HEWITT, Chief Judge. This is a post-award protest brought by HomeSource Real Estate Asset Services, Inc. (HomeSource or plaintiff), an unsuccessful offeror in Solicitation R-OPC-23441 (Solicitation) issued by the United States government acting through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD, the government or defendant). I. Backg
727 F.Supp.2d 876 (2010) UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. Nos. CV 04-2788 ABC (PLAx), CV 04-3386 ABC (PLAx), CV 05-3910 ABC (PLAx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 19, 2010. *878 John E. Lee, AUSA-Office of US Attorney, Los An
545 F.3d 1134 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Christopher Kim, a/k/a Kyung Joon Kim, KJ Kim and Chris Kim; Bora Lee; Se Young Kim; Young Ai Kim; Erica M. Kim; First Stephora Avenue, Inc.; Alexandria Investment, LLC, Claimants-Appellees, Optional Capital, Inc., a/k/a Optional Ventures, Claimant-Appellant, v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS CALIFORNIA, Real Property located at, a/k/a Seal A; 924 North
MEMORANDUM * The government, DAS Corporation (“DAS”), and Optional Capital, Inc. (“Optional”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of the government’s civil forfeiture complaint and grant of summary judgment in favor of Christopher Kim, Bora Lee, Erica Kim, Se Young Kim, Young Ai Kim, Alexandria Investment, LLC, and First Stephora Avenue, Inc. (“the Kim Claimants”).1 The Kim C
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Manuel SEGURA-DEL REAL, Defendant-Appellantpublic domain
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Jose Manuel Segura-Del Real pleaded. guilty to a one-count indictment for illegal reentry by an alien after deportation subsequent to conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1). The district court departed upward from the Sentencing Guidelines and sentenced Segura-Del Real to 41 months in prison. Segura-Del Real appeals this sentence arguing that his prior criminal record, which placed
In re the Marriage of Del Realpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-1670 Filed July 1, 2020 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF UBALDO DEL REAL AND GREGORIA DEL REAL Upon the Petition of UBALDO DEL REAL, Petitioner-Appellant, And Concerning GREGORIA DEL REAL, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Sioux County, Zachary Hindman, Judge. U
Opinion filed June 7, 2012 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals
Opinion filed June 7, 2012 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-10-00151-CV __________ HEIRS OF BERNARDO DEL REAL TO WIT: CARMEN DEL REAL HERRERA; LYDIA DEL REAL SELVERA; ROSALINDA DEL REAL GUTIERREZ; REFUGIO DEL REAL; MANUEL DEL REAL JR.; AND JOHN DEL REAL
State v. Del Real-Galvezpublic domain
TOOKEY, J. Defendant, who was convicted of two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree (Counts 1 and 3), ORS 163.427,1 and one count of coercion (Count 5), ORS 163.275,2 appeals the resulting judgment of conviction, raising four assignments of error. We reject without discussion defendant’s first assignment of error related to a CARES Northwest recorded interview wit
Don Del Real Herrera v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Opinion filed September 29, 2023 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00101-CR __________ DON DEL REAL HERRERA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 142nd District Court Midland Co
MEMORANDUM ** Claimants Zoyla Boyadzhyan-Asensio, Pogos Boyadzhyan, and Miriam Carmen Castillo appeal a summary judgment in favor of the government in a civil forfeiture action. We affirm. Zoyla’s1 claims that the house was not substantially connected to drug trafficking and that she is an “innocent owner” are without merit. Her conspiracy conviction established
Del Real, LLC v. Harrispublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCS. 26 & 37) LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Del Real, LLC (“Del Real”) prepares, packages, and sells fully cooked meat and poultry dishes that are distributed and sold throughout California. Several California counties have threatened enforcement actions against Del R
234 F.Supp.2d 1136 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9832 RICHEON AVENUE, Downey, California, Defendant. Pogos Boyadzhyan, Zoyla Ascensio Boyadzhyan, Miriam Ascensio Castillo, and PNC Mortgage Corp. of America, Claimants. No. CV0008504ABC(SHX). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 18, 2002.
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1545 ____________ ROGER ESTEBAN REAL, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES ____________ On Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigratio
Uniquest Del. LLC v. United Statespublic domain
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge *109INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court are the Government's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 37) and a cross-motion for summary judgment by Plaintiffs Uniquest Delaware LLC and Uniland Holdings LLC ("Plaintiffs") (Dkt. 41). The material facts are largely undisput
Heirs of Del Real v. Easonpublic domain
OPINION TERRY McCALL, Justice. Appellants alleged that they are heirs of Bernardo Del Real, deceased. They brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983,1 alleging that Del Real contracted a staph infection while a prisoner at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice French Robertson Unit and that the infection ultimately caused Del Real’s death. Appellee, Robert Eason, is