Cases

424 F.Supp.2d 1278 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. State of HAWAII, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.91-00137 DAE-KSC. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. March 24, 2006. *1279 Verlin Hughes Deerinwater, Richard J. Farano, David Deutsch, Robinsue Frohboese, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Michael Chun,

21 P.3d 646 (2001) 2001 OK CIV APP 37 Juanita DEERINWATER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CIRCUS CIRCUS ENTERPRISES, d/b/a Gold Strike Casino Resort, Defendant/Appellee. No. 94,537. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2. March 6, 2001. Bill M. Shaw, Shaw, Crutchfield & Shaw, Claremore, OK, for Appellant. Richard M. Eldridge,

249 F.3d 1213 (10th Cir. 2001) STATE OF KANSAS; BILL GRAVES, Governor of the State of Kansas, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GALE A. NORTON, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, her agents, employees, and successors; MONTE R. DEER, Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, United States Department of the Interior, his agents, employees, and successors; NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION, Depar

*1218 BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. These consolidated interlocutory appeals arise from a district court order granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Plaintiff State of Kansas. The order stays action on the National Indian Gaming Commission’s (NIGC) decision that a tract of non-reservation land in Kan

*571Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SCHALL. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge PLAGER. SCHALL, Circuit Judge. Sondra Deerinwater seeks review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) in Deerinwater v. Office of Personnel Management, 66 M.S.P.R. 183 (1995). In its decision, the Board affirmed th

374 F.Supp.2d 934 (2005) MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.03-2220-DJW. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 22, 2005. *935 *936 Kip A. Kubin, Bottaro, Morefield & Kubin, LC, Kansas City, MO, Christopher J. Reedy, Colant

86 F.Supp.2d 1094 (2000) STATE of Kansas, ex rel. Bill GRAVES, Governor of the State of Kansas, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 99-2341-GTV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 17, 2000. *1095 M.J. Willoughby, John W. Campbell, Office of Attorney General, Topeka, KS, Carla

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. William F. Johnston petitions for review of the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, Docket No. PH831E030308-I-1, 96 M.S.P.R. 116, 2004 WL 928212, affirming the Office of Personnel Management’s dismissal of his application for disability retirement benefits under the Civil Service Retirement System (“CSRS”). We vacate the dismissal, an

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Katherine McLaughlin (“McLaughlin”) seeks review of a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) denying her application for disability retirement as untimely because it was filed after the one-year statutory filing deadline. McLaughlin v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., No. DC844E020184-I-1, 2002 WL 31188888 (M.S.P.B. Sep

335 F.Supp.2d 1135 (2004) Richard L. BEAMS, Plaintiff, v. Gale NORTON, Secretary of Department of Interior, Defendant. No. 03-4072-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 7, 2004. *1136 *1137 *1138 Richard Lee Beams, Sunnyside, WA, pro se.</

91 P.3d 90 (2004) 2004 OK CIV APP 46 Thomas L. KLASSEN, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. George L. LAZIK, d/b/a Lazik Enterprises, Defendant/Appellant. No. 100,241. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2. April 13, 2004. *91 Brian R. Danker, Danker & Harrell, P.C., Claremore, OK, for Plaintiff/Appell

74 P.3d 612 (2003) 2003 OK CIV APP 61 Bonita Jean GULLO, (now McDaris), Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Ronald GULLO, Defendant/Appellant. No. 97,556. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 4. June 3, 2003. *614 Gary D. Underwood, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Shannon Davis, Tulsa, OK, for Def

220 P.3d 1166 (2009) 2009 OK CIV APP 90 WILLBROS USA, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON; Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. of Oklahoma, Inc.; and JLT Risk Solutions, Limited, Defendants/Appellees. No. 106,414. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division

Opinion by JERRY L. GOODMAN, Presiding Judge: ¶ 1 IJAM, Inc., and Monarch Computer Systems, Inc., (collectively Defendants) appeal from a judgment in favor of Plaintiff, V.J. Lively.1 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that it had in personam jurisdiction over these Georgia corporations. Upon review of the record on appeal and applicable la

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH MAR 5 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER Clerk

174 F.3d 1087 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650, 137 Lab.Cas. P 10,390,23 Employee Benefits Cas. 1073, 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1703 Terry A. GARVIN; John McGrail; Ferdnand Adamson; EdithAitken; Marva Akins; Douglas R. Allen; Shirley Allen;Loren Alm; Sheila Altman; Cornelious Anderson; Peggy C.Anderson; Claudette B. Anterin; Esther Arnold; Kenneth G.Arsenault; Jerry M. Ashley; Lindy Ashley; Johnice M.

EBEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, a group of former employees of Defendant Lucent Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”), sued Defendant in state court for fraud arising out of alleged misrepresentations made in encouraging Plaintiffs to take an early retirement benefits package. Defendant removed the case to federal court on the basis of complete preemption under the Employee Retire

BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge. Terry A. Garvin, et al., (collectively “Appellants”) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT & T) on their claims to recover termination allowances brought pursuant to § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). Facts Appellant