Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. De Luna”
United States v. De Luna-Munozpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arnulfo De Luna-Munoz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). De Luna-Munoz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
United States v. De Luna-Munozpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arnulfo De Luna-Munoz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). De Luna-Munoz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan
United States v. De Luna-Garciapublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marcelino De Luna-Garda (De Luna) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). De Luna has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. According
United States v. De-Lunapublic domain
3 F.3d 438 U.S.v.De-Luna* NO. 93-7111 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug 18, 1993 1 Appeal From: S.D.Tex. 2 A
United States v. Mallen-De Lunapublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Fernando Mallen-De Luna raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007),
De Luna-Vigil v. United Statespublic domain
C, A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. De Luna Toropublic domain
546 F.2d 427 U. S.v.De Luna Toro No. 76-2180 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 11/11/76 1 C.D.Cal. APPEAL DISMISSED
Patricia A. Luna v. United Statespublic domain
SYKES, Circuit Judge. Patricia Luna injured herself at the Great Lakes Naval Base, where she worked as an instructor under a contract between the Navy and a private contractor. She sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), which provides a remedy for personal injuries caused by negligent acts of governmental employees acting within the scope of their emp
United States v. Francisco De Luna-Trujillopublic domain
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: The district court imposed on a defendant who had pled guilty to a criminal offense a sentence that was beyond the range generally applicable, as established by the Sentencing Guidelines promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission. Because the guidelines sanction this departure from the guid
United States v. Medina-Lunapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-705 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:22-cr-02443- v. RSH-1 GENARO MEDINA-LUNA, OPINION Defendan
United States v. Cosme De Luna, Jr.public domain
GEE, Circuit Judge: This singular appeal from a conviction of possessing twenty-two hundred pounds of marijuana with intent to distribute it presents two conflicting points of error only. In one, de Luna asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury verdict that he knowingly possessed the drug; in the other, he asse
BEAM, Circuit Judge. Jose Mata-Peres pled guilty to five counts of methamphetamine possession and sales and one count of knowingly completing a false employment eligibility form. Felix Luna-Hernandez pled guilty to one count of knowingly and intentionally distributing and aiding and abetting in the distribution of methamphetamine. Each defendant was sentenced separately by the d
United States v. Luna-Gonzalezpublic domain
Case: 21-40397 Document: 00516324510 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 21-40397 May 18, 2022
Juanita De Luna v. Buc-Ee's, Ltd.public domain
Opinion issued May 23, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00917-CV ——————————— JUANITA DE LUNA, Appellant V. BUC-EE’S, LTD., A
United States v. Melissa Jean Lunapublic domain
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Melissa Jean Luna appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Southern District of Iowa, upon a jury verdict, finding her guilty of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and possession of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2. The
United States v. Carlos Lunapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1814 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Carlos Patricio Luna Defendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 18-3302 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v.
United States v. Lunapublic domain
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201500423 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. BENJAMIN D. LUNA Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
United States v. Bernice Enriquez Luna, United States of America v. Catherine Lynn Arcepublic domain
FAGG, Circuit Judge. Iowa State troopers saw a Ford Explorer and a motor home traveling together on Interstate 80. When the Explorer was stopped for speeding, the motor home failed to move out of the lane next to the stopped vehicles, even though the passing lane was open. A trooper stopped the motor home. Bernice Enri-quez Luna was driving, and Catherine Lynn Arce was a passeng
United States v. Lunapublic domain
649 F.3d 91 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Pascual LUNA, Defendant, Appellant. No. 09-2263. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard December 9, 2010. Decided August 12, 2011. *95 Kenneth Seiger, for appellant. Mark T. Quinlivan, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Carmen
De Luna v. Hidalgo Countypublic domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR DENIAL OF CLASS CERTIFICATION, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL RANDY CRANE, District Judge. I. Introduction Now before the Court are