Cases

*1062ante, p. 1038; ante, p. 1020; ante, p. 1038; 562 U. S. 1177; 563 U. S. 1036; 563 U. S. 1012; ante, p. 1006; ante, p. 1008; ante, p. 1023; ante, p. 1023; ante, p. 1041; ante, p. 1041; ante, p. 1009; ante, p. 1009; ante, p. 1042; ante, p. 1043; ante, p. 1043; 563 U. S. 103

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

539 U.S. 953 Garza-Hernandezv.United States.Perez-Huertav.United StatesZapata-Martinezv.United StatesSolis-Brionesv.United StatesCarbajal-Taglev.United StatesMartinez-Rodriguezv.United StatesSalinas-Rodriguezv.United StatesCortes-Gallegosv.United StatesMendoza-Martinezv.United StatesHernandez-Hernandezv.United StatesGonzalez-Medra

(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);

(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);

825 F.Supp. 19 (1993) UNITED STATES of America v. Martha CONCEPCION, a/k/a Martha Martinez, a/k/a Martha Morales, a/k/a Julianna Sanchez, a/k/a Sonia Serrano, a/k/a Gladys Torres, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Ana MORILLO, a/k/a Rossi Colon, a/k/a Marta Fernandez, a/k/a Luz Lopez, a/k/a Gloria Velez, a/k/a Jeanette Ruiz, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Jane ARENDELL, a/k/a Maria Gonzalez, a/k/a Annette Rive

ORDER Robert E. Wier, United States Magistrate Judge The Court assesses whether Defendant Samuel Girod must, as part of full “processing” by the United States Marshals Service, submit to being photographed. Girod faces several charges centering on allegedly selling misbranded drugs in violation of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. See DE # 1 (Indictment). The Indictment further asserts that Girod

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendant’s Objections to August 28, 2013 Redisclosed Presentence Investigation Report, filed October 2, 2013 (Doc. 151)(“Objections”);. (ii) the Sentencing Memorandum of Keith Michael Courtney, filed October 3, 2013 (Doc. 152)(“Sen-tencing Memo.”); and (iii) the Letter from Keith Mich

OPINION DAMON J. KEITH, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Nabila Mahbub of conspiring to commit healthcare fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1349. The district court sentenced Mahbub to a below-guidelines range sentence of forty-six months in prison. ' Mahbub timely appealed. On "appeal, Mahbub contends the following: (1) the district court erred in denying Mahbub’s cha

PER CURIAM: Appellants Timothy Bowen, Juan Vega, and Rene Salazar were convicted of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Appellants challenge various aspects of their convictions, and Bowen also challenges his sentence. Because we' find no reversible error in Appellants’ convictions or Bowen’s sentence, we AFFIRM.

820 F.Supp.2d 151 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Gary Lee SAMPSON. Cr. No. 01-10384-MLW. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 20, 2011. *155 George W. Vien, Donnelly, Conroy & Gelhaar, LLP, John A. Wortmann, Jr., Mark T. Quinlivan, Zachary R. Hafer, *156 United Stat

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. Defendant Jay Stuart De Vaughn mailed twelve hoax anthrax letters to the President of the United States, seven members of Congress, and two Argentine consulates in the United States. He pleaded guilty to multiple counts of mailing threatening *1143 communications in violat

473 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jose Miguel BATTLE, Jr., et. al., Defendants. No. 04 20159 CR GOLD, 04 20159 CR BANDSTRA. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. June 16, 2006. *1186 *1187 *1188 *1189

MEMORANDUM ** Luis Verde-Eb appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm and remand. Verde-Eb contends that his sentence must be vacated because the district court did not verify that he had read the presentence repor

CRAWFORD, Chief Judge (dissenting): Even if the military judge clearly abused his discretion by denying the challenge for cause against Lt Col Fernandez on the basis of implied bias,1 that error was rendered *196harmless when Appellant used his peremptory challenge to remove Lt

722 F.Supp.2d 1293 (2010) MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Case No. 08-23001-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. July 12, 2010. *1294 Claudio Riedi, Felippe Moncarz, Kelly Brooks Smith, Lehtinen Riedi Brooks Moncar

TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a conviction of appellant of one count of conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute and one count of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. He was arrested with three other men by Customs agents off the coast of Florida. Co-defendant Torres was tried

JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Tomas Varela-Andujo, was convicted of five counts of having unlawfully transported aliens illegally in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2). He has appealed his conviction (84-1510) and has appealed the denial of motions for a new trial (84-1415). The cases have been

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. Defendant, James L. Harrold, Sr., appeals his conviction for income tax evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201. On appeal defendant claims that: (1) his indictment was insufficient; (2) the government and its witnesses improperly referred at trial to his assertion during pretrial investigations of his Fifth Amendment right to