Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 18-1774 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ORLANDO DÁVILA-BONILLA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric Davila has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Davila has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relev

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, STEPHENS, and FOIL, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Diego F. DAVILA-NARVAEZ Hospital Corpsman First Class (E-6)

HOWARD, Chief Judge. These appeals arise out of a widespread corruption scandal at the Puerto Rico Board of Medical Examiners (the “Board”), the former licensing authority for doctors seeking to practice in Puerto Rico. Cesar Berroa, Julio Castro,'Geraldo Castro, Raysa Pacheco-Medina, and Glenda Davila all sought medical licenses but failed to pass the required exams. Undeterred, they attempted to gain certification by obtai

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d)(1) provides that a defendant may withdraw a guilty plea “for any reason or no reason” at any time before the court *250 accepts it. The matter at hand requires us to decide a question of first impression in this circuit concerning the op

Justice GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court. *600 This case concerns Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which governs guilty pleas. Two provisions of that rule are key here. The first, Rule 11(c)(1), instructs that "[t]he court must not participate in [plea] discuss

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 13-1225 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CARLOS DÁVILA-FÉLIX, a/k/a Carlos Mona, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

664 F.3d 1355 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony DAVILA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 10-15310, 11-10224 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. December 21, 2011. *1357 R. Brian Tanner, James D. Durham, Edward J. Tarver, Savannah, GA, Edmund A. Booth, Jr., Carlton R. Bou

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari granted.

OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. On December 13, 2011, the First Circuit Court of Appeals remanded this case for re-sentencing. United States v. Davila-Felix, 667 F.3d 47 (1st Cir.2011). In a status conference held on May 16, 2012, the United States (“the government”) indicated that in preparation for re-sentencing, it had acquired additional evidence concerning the June 25, 1993 conviction

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Eduardo Dávila-Nieves (Dávila) got caught attempting to induce a person he believed to be a minor to engage in sexual activity, and a Puerto Rico jury found him guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Claiming multiple errors, he appeals. As we find no merit to Dávila’s arguments, we affirm. BACKGROUND “The f

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 09-2495 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CARLOS DÁVILA-FÉLIX, a/k/a CARLOS MOÑA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 08-2575 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. NOEL DÁVILA-GONZÁLEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. José Antonio Fusté, U.S. District Judge]

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 06-1596 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LORENZO DAVILA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illin

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * ROBERT H. HENRY, Circuit Judge. Julio Davila-Salvatierra pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). The district court imposed a sentence at the bottom of the range suggested by the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“USSG” or “Guidelines”). Mr. Davila-Salvat

PER CURIAM.* Armando Rodolfo Davila-Velasco appeals the sentence imposed following his *923guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Davila-Velasco complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He ar

PER CURIAM.* Jaime Davila-Barraza appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. Davila-Barraza contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offen

PER CURIAM.* Javier Davila-Juarez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea *982conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C, § 1326. Davila-Juarez contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He theref

124 F.3d 221 U.S.v.Davila* NO. 96-4063 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Aug 29, 1997 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. ,No.9306179CRUUB 1 Affirmed.

55 F.3d 632 U.S.v.Davila* NO. 94-50457 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. May 02, 1995 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex., No. A-92-CR-215-(4) 2