⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Daugherty”

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and MYERS Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Micole A. DAUGHERTY Machinist’s Mate Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 375 F. App'x 401
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Derrick Tyrone Daugherty has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Daugherty has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, couns
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 375 F. App'x 401
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Derrick Tyrone Daugherty has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Daugherty has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, couns
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006-01-24 · Published · cited 1× · 438 F.3d 445; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 1756; 2006 WL 164947
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Although, in this ineffective assistance of counsel claim brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the defendant-appellant raises an issue of first impression in this Circuit— whether, when a sentence has been vacated because of a defect, the government may present new evidence at resentencing to cure that defect and then reimpose the earlier sentence — the f
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001-08-28 · Published · cited 357× · 264 F.3d 513; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19201; 2001 WL 984679
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Mitchell Daugherty appeals his conviction of violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2001), which prohibits convicted felons from possessing firearms “in and affecting” interstate commerce. We affirm. I. Daugherty was convicted in state court of delivery of marihuana and injury to a child and was imprisoned. I
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1984-12-03 · Published · cited 6× · 599 F. Supp. 671
599 F.Supp. 671 (1984) UNITED STATES of America v. Ronald L. DAUGHERTY and Thomas E. Daugherty, Individually and d/b/a Daugherty & Daugherty Construction Co., Inc., and Daugherty Brothers Construction, Inc.; Daugherty & Daugherty Construction Co., Inc. and Daugherty Brothers Construction, Inc. No. CIV. 3-84-12. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, N.D. December
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982-11-12 · Published · cited 0× · 701 F.2d 181
701 F.2d 181 U. S.v.Daugherty 82-1300 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 11/12/82 1 E.D.Mich. AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 701 F.2d 181
701 F.2d 181 U. S.v.Daugherty 80-1821 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 3/1/82 1 E.D.Mich. AFFIRMED
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-10-17 · Published · cited 4× · 342 F. Supp. 3d 418
DENISE COTE, District Judge: Michael J. Daugherty, relator, brings this qui tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. ("FCA") against Tiversa Holding Corporation, Tiversa Inc., and Tiversa Government Inc. (collectively "Tiversa") and against Robert Boback, a former Tiversa e
Daugherty v. Whitepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 284; 205 L. Ed. 2d 145
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Daugherty v. Sheerpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-03-04 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 1294; 203 L. Ed. 2d 415
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974-07-31 · Published · cited 0× · 500 F.2d 1405; 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7392
500 F.2d 1405 U. S.v.Daugherty 73-1524 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Seventh Circuit 7/31/74 1 E.D.Ill. 2 REVERSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART, AND REMANDED
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 931
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 931
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 931; 124 S. Ct. 346
540 U.S. 931 DAUGHERTYv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-5922. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 67 Fed. A
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2023-06-08 · Published · cited 0×
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-6011 ___________________________ In re: Timothy Michael Davies, Debtor. ___________________________ Timothy Michael Davies, Debtor – Appellant,
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 534 U.S. 1150; 122 S. Ct. 1113
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 568 U.S. 1227; 133 S. Ct. 1624
C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 8, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002-07-15 · Published · cited 2× · 212 F. Supp. 2d 1279; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13367; 2002 WL 1610263
212 F.Supp.2d 1279 (2002) Marshall D. DAUGHERTY, and Debra Denise Daugherty, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-1037-EA(J). United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. July 15, 2002. *1280 *1281 *1282
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-07-22 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 25; 186 L. Ed. 2d 938; 82 U.S.L.W. 3063; 570 U.S. 936; 2013 WL 3779000; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5003
Former decision, 133 S.Ct. 2338.Petition for rehearing denied.