Cases

636 F.2d 1211 U. S.v.Digirolamo 80-1446 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 12/2/80 1 D.N.J. AFFIRMED

634 F.2d 636 U. S.v.Digirolamo 80-1148, 80-1149 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 11/24/80 D.Hawaii REVERSED AND REMANDED

SUMMARY ORDER We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of this case. Petitioner-Appellant Gaetano DiGirolamo Sr. (“DiGirolamo”) appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as well as his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). Because DiGirolamo did not file a timely notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction to <

516 F.2d 896 U. S.v.Digirolamo 74-2693 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 5/1/75 1 D.Conn. AFFIRMED

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: In March of 1991, appellant Gaetano DiGi-rolamo, Sr., and his co-defendant, Louis Salerno, were arrested in a government sting operation targeting heroin distribution in Long Island, New York. After a jury trial, both DiGirolamo and Salerno were convicted of conspiracy to distribute heroin and conspiracy to possess more than one kilogram of heroin with i

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT THOMAS M; DiGIROLAMO, United States Magistrate Judge. ■ This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Criminal Refusal Count (the “Motion”) (ECF No. 11), which the Government opposed (ECF No. 12). Ño hearing is required. L.R. 105.6. Defendant’s Motion is DENIED, for the reasons set forth below. BACKGROUND

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This pretrial appeal in a criminal prosecution concerns primarily a claim under the Double Jeopardy Clause. Specifically, the issue is whether defendants have made a sufficient showing to require the Government to prove that the narcotics conspiracy alleged in a pending indictment is separate from na

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge: Appellants Oreste Abbamonte, Joseph DelVecchio, and Guy DiGirolamo protest that count one of an indictment returned in the District of Connecticut alleging that they conspired to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute heroin has infringed their right to be free of double jeopardy because

676 F.Supp.2d 431 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, v. Adrian ELLIOTT, Defendant. Case No. 08-4160M. United States District Court, D. Maryland. December 23, 2009. *432 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS THOMAS M. DiGIROLAMO, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Cou

656 F.Supp.2d 560 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Clark DARDEN, Defendant. Case No. 09-602M. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 24, 2009. *561 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT THOMAS M. DiGIROLAMO, United States Magistrate Judge. In the case of Melendez-Diaz v. Massach

595 F.3d 854 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jhanmay MOLINA-PEREZ, Appellant. No. 09-1611. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 18, 2009. Filed: February 23, 2010. *858 Christina M. DiGirolamo, Berkowitz Oliver Williams, Shaw & Eisenbrandt LLP, Kansas City, MO, arg

688 N.E.2d 116 (1997) 179 Ill.2d 24 227 Ill.Dec. 779 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Jason DIGIROLAMO, Appellee. No. 81139. Supreme Court of Illinois. October 23, 1997. Rehearing Denied December 1, 1997. *118 State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor

876 F.2d 892 Digirolamov.Butler* NO. 88-3568 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. MAY 24, 1989 1 Appeal From: E.D.La. 2

Gants, J. The plaintiff, Jean DiGirolamo (“DiG-irolamo”), received workers’ compensation benefits after breaking her leg while working as a skate guard at a Metropolitan District Commission rink. The Public Employment Retirement Administration retained a private investigative agency, the defendant D.P. Anderson & Associates, Inc. (“D.P. Anderson”), to conduct a visual surveillance of Ms. DiGirolamo to determine whether she wa

MEMORANDUM OPINION PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge. Benjamin R. Bilik has appealed his conviction for possession of a weapon in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 2.4. following a bench trial before Magistrate Judge Thomas M. DiGirolamo. For the following reasons, the conviction is AFFIRMED. I. At approximately 2:45 A.M. on March 11,2014, U.S. Park Police Sgt. Dani

418 F.Supp. 695 (1976) Thomas O. BATEY et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gary L. DIGIROLAMO and Bonnie L. Digirolamo, Defendants. No. 76-0103. United States District Court, D. Hawaii. August 26, 1976. *696 John A. Chanin, Jerry A. Ruthruff, Chanin & Ruthruff, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs. Felix A. Maciszewski, Honolulu, Hawai

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Pending before the court is the government’s interlocutory appeal from an order issued November 18, 2013, by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. DiGi-rolamo, granting a motion to suppress filed *401by Appellee Michael E. Lechliter. The relevant issues have been briefed and the parties pre

618 F.Supp. 1430 (1985) UNITED STATES of America, v. Oreste ABBAMONTE, a/k/a "Ernie boy", Joseph Del Vecchio, a/k/a "Joe Crow", Guy A. Di Girolamo, Defendants. Crim. No. N-83-47 (TFGD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. October 8, 1985. William A. Keefer, John H. Durham, Attys., U.S. Dept. of Justice, New Haven, Conn., Alan H. Nevas, U.S. Atty., for plai

OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: On August 26, 2010, a Grand Jury returned a sealed Indictment charging Defendants with committing various narcotics and firearms crimes. (Dkt. No. 2.) Several days later, law enforcement officials arrested Defendants Robert Santiago (“Santiago” or “Comanche”) and Walter Tarrats (“Tarrats”) (collectively, “the Moving Defendants”), along with several