Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ________________ No. 04-2151 ________________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v.

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Darcy Jay Betterton appeals his conviction on three counts of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance *829after having been previously convicted of at least one felony drug offense, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), 841(b)(1)(B) and 851. In addition, Betterton raises for the first time on appeal the argument that his sen

PD-1094-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/11/2015 5:54:09 PM Accepted 12/14/2015 7:53:05 AM ABEL ACOSTA No. PD-1094-15 CLERK IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. *30 This is a case about a double life, an attempted uxoricide, and excellent police work. Defendant-Appellant Gregory Owens ("Owens") was convicted of interstate domestic violence in violation of

PD-1094-15 PD-1094-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/21/2015 1:49:34 PM Accepted 8/25/2015 4:26:51 PM ABEL ACOSTA

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1094-15 CHRISTOPHER EARL DARCY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS MOORE COUNTY K ELLER, P.J., delivered the o

MEMORANDUM *** Jerome Brown appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, the former sheriff, and four individual officers (collectively, “defendants”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. “We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Viewing the evidence and drawing all inference

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

ORDER Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 6]. Plaintiff is seeking damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of The Family Health Centers of Georgia, Inc. (“Family Health Centers”) 1 and

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2024 ME 9 Docket: And-21-131 Argued: October 5, 2021 Reargued: April 6, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2024 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, JABAR, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ., CLIFFORD, A.R.J., and HUMPHREY, A.R.J.* Majority: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD and JABAR, JJ., and HUMPHREY, A.R.J. Dissent: HORTON and CONNORS, JJ., and CLIFFORD, A.R.J.

Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice MINTON. We have a long-recognized preference in our criminal law for jointly trying defendants who are, or could have been, jointly indicted. Joint trials promote judicial economy and consistent verdicts; but they present unique difficulties, as well. This case presents an opportunity for us to confront one of those joint-trial difficulties and to provide trial courts with g

*143ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS A PORTION OF THE INDICTMENT JON D. LEVY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Ishmael Douglas moves to dismiss a portion of Count Six of the Indictment for failure to state an offense. ECF No. 112. Specifically, Douglas seeks to dismiss the allegation that he knowingly used, carried, and brandished a firearm during

PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on the government’s [240] Motion for Restitution, and the government’s [250] Supplemental Motion for Restitution. The government seeks restitution for five victims from the “Misty,” “8 Kids,” “Sponge B,” and “Angela” series pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 22

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Paul David Hite was convicted by a jury on two counts of attempted coercion and enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) on February 13, 2013. On July 2, 2013, this Court sentenced Dr. Hite to 264 months of imprisonment followed by supervised release for a period of 120

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Paul David Hite’s [186] Motion for an Order Setting Conditions of Release Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142. Dr. Hite seeks release pending re-trial, arguing that conditions of release can be set that reasonably assure his appearance at re-trial

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Per Curiam Plaintiffs filed these actions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma to challenge a regulation issued by the Environmental Protection Agency defining the term “waters of the United States” for purposes of the Clean Water Act. The district court dismissed both cases, concluding

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-13-00297-CR ________________________ CHRISTOPHER EARL DARCY, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE