Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1875 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MICHEL D'ANGELO, a/k/a Karma, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Nancy Torresen, U.S. District Judge]

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Michel D’Angelo (“D’Angelo”) pleaded guilty to bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and was sentenced to 180 months’ imprisonment, a downwardly variant sentence. He appeals the district court’s denial of credit for acceptance of responsibility under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 3E1.1. Finding no error, we affi

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

OPINION1 ROBERT N. OPEL, II, Bankruptcy Judge. The Chapter 13 Debtors in the Adversary Proceeding seek a determination of the priorities of two mortgages against their principal residence. For the reasons stated herein, I conclude that the mortgage held by Blue Chip Federal Credit Union is superior to any mortgage claim by Metro Bank. I. JURISDICTION

OPINION1 ROBERT N. OPEL, II, Bankruptcy Judge. Presently pending are two motions for summary judgment. The first is Defendant, Metro Bank’s (“Metro”), Motion for Summary Judgment which was filed on October 1, 2013 (“Metro Motion”). The second is Defendant, Blue Chip Federal Credit Union’s (“Blue Chip”), Cross Motion for Summary Judgment filed on December 6, 2013 (“Blue Chip Motio

OPINION1 ROBERT N. OPEL, II, Bankruptcy Judge. Pending before the Court is Creditor/Defendant Blue Chip Federal Credit Union’s (“Blue Chip”) Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion seeks not to dismiss the adversary entirely, but instead only to determine the priority of Blue Chip’s and the other Creditor/Defendant, Metro Bank’s (“Metro”), security interests in the Debtors’ pr

MEMORANDUM MAGDELINE D. COLEMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. INTRODUCTION Before this Court for adjudication is the Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Adversary Complaint and for Abstention dated June 3, 2013 (the “Motion”), filed by J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Defendant” or “J.P. Morgan”) that requests this Court to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint dated May 17, 2013 (

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-3584 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States

MEMORANDUM MAGDELINE D. COLEMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. INTRODUCTION On May 8, 2012, this Court held an expedited hearing (the “Expedited Hearing”) to address a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [Docket No. 5] (the “Injunction Motion”) filed by James Albert D’Angelo, Sr. and Carolyn Marie D’Angelo (the “Debtors”). Pursuant to the Injunction Motion, the Debtors requested

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF KAREN D’ANGELO’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT JOHN R. KELLEY TO SUBMIT [SIC] OR PROVIDE SAMPLES OF HIS DNA FOR TESTING BY DNA ANALYSIS SPECIALISTS AND TO SHOW CAUSE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SUBPOENA (#39) COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Factual Background In Count Two of her Second Amended Complaint (#21), plaintiff Kare

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION OF DEFENDANT, JOHN R. KELLEY, TO REMOVE DEFAULT (#49, filed 214104) COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction The original Complaint (# 1) in this case and an Amended Complaint were filed on December 17, 2001 and May 19, 2002 respectively. The plaintiffs are two postal workers who claim that their supervisor, defendan

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO . 01-272 ANTHONY D'ANGELO , APPELLANT , V. ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and STEINBERG and GREENE, Judges. ORDER On June 18, 2002, the Court, in a single-judge order, denied the appellant's application for attorney fees and e

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Ezio D’Angelo pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine, being a felon in possession of a weapon, and tampering with a witness, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(3), respectively. Mr. D’Angelo says that it was only after he pleaded guilty that he learned that his criminal history score unde

BRORBY, Circuit Judge. This appeal stems from a district court order granting the government’s certification to proceed against the defendant juvenile in federal court and its motion to proceed against the defendant juvenile as an adult for charges related to a car jacking. Appellant contends the district court did not have jurisdiction to hear the case or to transfer the appell

542 U.S. 922 D'ANGELOv.RATELLE, WARDEN. No. 03-9892. Supreme Court of United States. June 21, 2004. 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 193.

378 B.R. 365 (2007) In re Donna PARKER, Debtor. Concetta D'Angelo, Plaintiff, v. Donna Parker, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 8:05-bk-7017-PMG, Adversary No. 8:05-ap-515-PMG. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. August 1, 2007. *366 George L. Hayes, III, Kathie Jo Malti, Carla L. Turner-Hahn, The Hayes Law

377 B.R. 371 (2006) In re Donna PARKER, Debtor. Concetta D'Angelo, Plaintiff, v. Donna Parker, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 8:05-bk-7017-PMG, Adversary No. 8:05-ap-515-PMG. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. September 8, 2006. *372 B. Gray Gibbs, Janette McCurley, Law Office of B. Gray Gibbs, St. Peter

D'Angelo v Kujawski (2024 NY Slip Op 05200) D'Angelo v Kujawski 2024 NY Slip Op 05200 Decided on October 23, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <