Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Cypress Gulf Development Corporation”
Biloxi Marsh Lands Corporation v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 12-382, 14-3, 15-710, 15-711 (consolidated) (Filed: 27 October 2021) *************************************** BILOXI MARSH LANDS * CORPORATION, et al., * * Motion for Reconsideration; Doctrine of Plaintiffs, * Justifiable Uncertainty; Statute of
Biloxi Marsh Lands Corporation v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 12-382 (Filed: 19 January 2021) *************************************** BILOXI MARSH LANDS * CORPORATION, et al., * * Motion for Summary Judgment; Cross- Plaintiff, * Motion for Summary Judgment; Statute
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN E. OTT, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court are the defendants’ motions to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint. (Docs. 24, 26, 32).1 The motions have been fully briefed. Upon due consideration, the court finds that the motions are due to be granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Pa
RADER, Circuit Judge. After a jury verdict, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware denied EMI Group North America, Inc.’s motion for a new trial. EMI Group N. Am., Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corp., 104 F.Supp.2d 370 (D.Del.2000). Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the jury verdicts were consis
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendant Professional Service Industries, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 39), filed March 20, 2011, and Plaintiff Spanish/Cypress Fort I, L.P.’s Motion to Partially Strike Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 42), filed March 25, 2011. Having considered the Motions, the Court hereby DENIES both Defendant’s Motion to D
United States v. Moralespublic domain
ORDER ROY B. DALTON, JR., District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the following: 1. Petitioner Linda M. Morales’ Petition for Hearing to Adjudicate Validity of Third Party Interest Under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) (Doc. 131), filed December 7, 2012; 2. United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 209), filed October 21, 2013;
St. Bernard Parish Government v. United Statespublic domain
Temporary Takings Claim; U.S. Const, amend. V. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON LIABILITY REGARDING A TEMPORARY TAKING BY FLOODING BRADEN, Judge. On October 17, 2005, St. Bernard Parish, a governmental entity of the State of Louisiana, and owner of real property, together with private owners of real property, located either in St.
486 F.Supp.2d 261 (2007) DOLCO INVESTMENTS, LTD., Cypress, Plaintiff, v. MOONRIVER DEVELOPMENT, LTD., GML, Ltd., and Kevin Bromley, Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 12876(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 26, 2007. *262 *263 Lyons & Flood, LLP, by: Kirk M. Lyons, New York, NY
Land Grantors v. United Statespublic domain
FINAL REPORT AND MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING S. 794, “A BILL FOR THE RELIEF OF LAND GRANTORS IN HENDERSON, UNION, AND WEBSTER COUNTIES, KENTUCKY, AND THEIR HEIRS.”1 BRADEN, Judge and Hearing Officer. Following the onset of World War II, the United States (“Government”) acquired, pursuant to the War Purposes Act of 1917, 40 Stat. 241 (codified as amended at 50 U.S.C. § 171) (repe
St. Bernard Parish v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES RAISED BY THE COURT AND DEFENDANT’S NOVEMBER 7, 2008 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. BRADEN, Judge. On October 17, 2005, St. Bernard Parish, a governmental entity of the State of Louisiana and owner of real property, as well as private owners of real property in St. Bernard Parish and the lower Ninth Ward of the City of New Orleans, filed suit in t
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is the Renewed Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed by Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Highway Products, LLC (collectively, “Trinity”) (Dkt. No. 596). Having considered the motion, the related briefing in support of and in opposition to the same, the oral arguments presented by coun
Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral Boardpublic domain
317 So.2d 576 (1974) GULF OIL CORPORATION v. STATE MINERAL BOARD et al. No. 54776. Supreme Court of Louisiana. December 2, 1974. On Rehearing July 25, 1975. *577 Henican, James & Cleveland, C. Ellis Henican, Carl W. Cleveland, New Orleans, for Milner Realty Co., Inc., Louis Carmadelle, Jr., and Gustave Carmad
Energy Development Corp. v. St. Martinpublic domain
128 F.Supp.2d 368 (2000) ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. Michael X. ST. MARTIN, Virginia Rayne St. Martin, and the Louisiana Land and Exploration Company Nos. Civ.A. 98-3395, Civ.A. 99-1793. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. December 12, 2000. *369 John Franklin Whitney, James A. Barton, III, David Randolph Richards
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L (Filed: December 17, 2019) ********************************** ) IN RE UPSTREAM ADDICKS AND ) Post-trial decision; government-induced BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD- ) flooding on private property; application of CONTROL RESERVOIRS ) factors identified in Arkan
541 F.Supp. 1025 (1982) BAYOU DES FAMILLES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES CORPS OF ENGINEERS, United States Department of the Interior, and United States of America, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 79-4324. United States District Court, E. D. Louisiana. April 20, 1982. *1026 *1027
Hardy v. Gulf Oil Corp.public domain
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: The posture of the parties in the instant appeal, if not entirely unprecedented, is nonetheless unusual.1 Alfred L. Hardy (“Hardy”), the unfortunate victim of a pipeline explosion off the coast of Zaire, initiated a personal injury action against multiple defendants. He later reached settlements with all of the defendants and thus is no longer a party to this action. The d
949 F.2d 826 Alfred L. HARDY, Plaintiff,v.GULF OIL CORPORATION, Zaire Gulf Oil Company, Gulf OilExploration and Production Company and CabindaGulf Oil Company, Defendants-Third PartyPlaintiffs-Appellees,v.BOUYGUES OFFSHORE U.S.A., INC. and Bouygues Offshore S.A.,Defendants-Third Party Defendants-Appellants,On and Offshore Quality Control Specialists, Inc., Defendant. No. 90-2061.
Opinion issued August 16, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00473-CV ——————————— SUBODH SONWALKAR, M.D. AND WOLLEY OLADUT, M. D., Appellants V. ST. LUKE’S SUGAR LAND PARTNERSHIP, L.
Exxon Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION REGINALD W. GIBSON, Senior Judge. Table of Contents Subject Page INTRODUCTION........................................................ 588 BACKGROUND ......................................................... 588 I. Exxon’s 1975 Sales Of Natural Gas Pursuant To Long-Term Contracts..... 588 II. The Statutory Allow
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-01110-COA MARY O’NEILL-MARNECHECK AND PHILIP APPELLANTS A. MARNECHECK v. VAL’S PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/11/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RANDI PERESICH MUELLER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,