Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “United States v. Currency $279,354”
United States v. Malewickapublic domain
664 F.3d 1099 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jadwiga MALEWICKA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-3967. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 27, 2011. Decided December 29, 2011. *1101 Madeleine S. Murphy (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chic
United States v. Real Property in Santa Paula, Cal.public domain
763 F.Supp.2d 1175 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. REAL PROPERTY IN SANTA PAULA, CALIFORNIA, Defendant. Case No. CV 05-08217 MMM (VBKx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 25, 2011. *1176 Frank D. Kortum, AUSA-Office of U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff.
219 F.Supp.2d 403 (2002) UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY and American Home Assurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. BRASPETRO OIL SERVICES COMPANY, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. (formerly known as Bank of Tokyo Ltd.-Japan), and Long Term Credit Bank of Japan, Ltd., Defendants. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and American Home Assurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras, et al., Defendants.<
Nasir v. State of Delawarepublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MALIK NASIR, : : C.A. No.: K16M-03-005 JJC PETITIONER, : : v. : : STATE OF DELAWARE, : : RESPONDENT. :
Adler v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BABCOCK, District Judge. This matter is before me on two motions by American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (“American”). The first is its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Gary Adler’s original complaint [Doc # 7], The second is its Motion to Dismiss Adler’s Amended Complaint [Doc #24], Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. After considering the parties’ arguments, and f
Lloyd v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commissionpublic domain
OPINION BY Judge PELLEGRINI. Before this Court are petitions for review of the December 22, 2004 order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) filed by William R. Lloyd, Jr. on behalf of the Office of Small Business Advocate (OSBA); Irwin A. Popow-sky on behalf of the Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA); the Commission of Economic Opportunity (CEO); and PP & L Industrial Custome
205 F.3d 615 (3rd Cir. 2000) RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Receiver for City Savings, F.S.B., in Receivership,v.FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND; WILLEM RIDDER; JOHN T. HURST; LYNDON C. MERKLE; GREGORY DEVANYFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as statutory successor to Resolution Trust Corporation, Appellant No. 98-6368 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT