Cases

DONALD, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which ROGERS and STRANCH, JJ., joined. STRANCH, J. (pg. 767), delivered a separate concurrence. OPINION BERNICE B. DONALD, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant, George Coving-ton, III, appeals the district court’s designation of his prior conviction for prison escape under Michigan Compiled Laws section 750.193 as a “crime of violence” for p

CCA 20090877. Appellant’s second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including December 11, 2012, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

CCA 20090877. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to November 26, 2012.

*BAKER, Chief Judge (dissenting): Consistent with my views in United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209, 217 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (Baker, C.J., dissenting), and United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225, 240 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (Baker, J., dissenting), I respectfully dissent.

CCA 20090877. Review granted on the following issue: WHEN THE GOVERNMENT FAILS TO ALLEGE AN ARTICLE 134 TERMINAL ELEMENT, THE CHARGE FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE UNLESS THE TERMINAL ELEMENT CAN BE “NECESSARILY IMPLIED” FROM THE LANGUAGE OF THE SPECIFICATION. THE MISSING TERMINAL ELEMENT FROM SPECIFICATIONS 1, 2, AND 3 OF CHARGE IV CANNOT BE NECESSARILY IMPLIED FROM THE TEXT. ARE THE SPECIFICATIONS FATALLY DEFECTIVE?

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kennedy Covington appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the d

CCA 20090877. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file a brief and the joint appendix granted, up to and including April 30, 2012, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kennedy Covington appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant Lashan Covington (“Coving-ton”), who had been convicted of assault with intent to commit murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(1), now appeals from a judgment revoking his supervised release on that conviction and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of 3 months and an ensuing 57-month period of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), (h). In the aftermath of United

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant Lashan Covington (“Coving-ton”), who had been convicted of assault with intent to commit murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(1), now appeals from a judgment revoking his supervised release on that conviction and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of 3 months and an ensuing 57-month period of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), (h). In the aftermath of United

565 F.3d 1336 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Curtis COVINGTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-10513. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 22, 2009. *1340 Brian L. Josias (Court-Appointed), Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant. Todd B. Grandy, K

*580ORDER AND JUDGMENT ** PAUL J. KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Dejuan Martez Covington appeals from the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of knowingly and intentionally distributing 5 or more grams of cocaine base (crack cocaine) in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Qualifying as a

MEMORANDUM ** Detrich Covington appeals his 108-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(B), and aiding and abetting money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956. Covington waived his right to appeal. Because the waiver is both valid and enforceable, we cannot decide t

MERRITT, Circuit Judge. This sentencing case is here for the second time because of the problem created by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). The defendant Covington, who has one prior felony drug conviction, was sentenced before Apprendi was decided, and the case was pending on appeal when Apprendi was decided. On March 21, 2001, we remanded this criminal

499 F.3d 464 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The COVINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee, v. Danniesha Keys, by Arthur Keys and Peggy Keys; Savon Keys, by Arthur Keys and Peggy Keys; Kadisha Owens, by Johnny Fairley; Zantario Jenkins, by Johnny Fairley; Cillmuriea Keys, by Lizzie Keys; Jahrina Keys, by Lizzie Keys, Nickie Owens, by Brenda Durr; Brenna Owens, by Brenda Durr; Renee Owens, by Brenda Durr,

MERRITT, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by two codefendants, Eric Covington and James Klopfer, convicted after a jury trial in a marijuana conspiracy case. Both defendants raise numerous evidentiary issues challenging their convictions as well as sentencing issues. In addition, both defendants filed motions shortly before oral argument raising questions about the validity of their sentences in light of the Supreme Court’s

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-CF-814 CAMILLE COVINGTON, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELL

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4654 Doc: 38 Filed: 04/26/2023 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4654 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent – Appellee, v. JOEL MATTHEW COVINGTON, Pet

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

818 F.Supp. 159 (1993) The UNITED STATES of America v. Larry Jerome COVINGTON, Jr. Crim. No. 92-0507-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. April 8, 1993. *160 Marcus Davis, Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, VA, for plaintiff. Eric Michael Weight, Alexandria, VA, for defendant.