⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Corro”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999-08-25 · Published · cited 11× · 187 F.3d 483; 1999 WL 649084
DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: Corro-Balbuena appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found present in the United States without permission after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Corro-Balbuena pleaded guilty and was sentenced, on his own motion and over the government’s objection, without a presentence report or formal recommendation from the proba
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010-08-17 · Published · cited 0× · 391 F. App'x 368
PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Martinez-Corro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v, California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Martinez-Corro has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Martinez-Corro’s response discloses no non-frivolous issue for
Corro v. Stephenspublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-01-13 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 993; 187 L. Ed. 2d 842; 82 U.S.L.W. 3408; 571 U.S. 1159; 2014 WL 103063; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 344
Former decision, 134 S.Ct. 477.Petition for rehearing denied.
Corro v. Stephenspublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-10-21 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 477; 187 L. Ed. 2d 323; 82 U.S.L.W. 3234; 571 U.S. 976; 2013 WL 4433787; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7697
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013-06-10 · Published · cited 180× · 718 F.3d 1174; 2013 WL 2462171; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11674
OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: This petition raises a matter of first impression in the Ninth Circuit regarding the interpretation of “physically present” in the voluntary departure provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1229e(b)(l)(A). We interpret physically present in this provision as requiring uninterrupted presence
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975-05-21 · Published · cited 15× · 516 F.2d 137; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14589
COFFIN, Chief Judge. Appellant, a Colombian citizen, was convicted in the District Court for Puerto Rico of the purchase of cocaine not in or from the original stamped package in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4704, of receiving and concealing cocaine knowing it to have been brought into the United States contrary to law in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174,
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2018-12-19 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00688-CV Jose CORRO and Concepcion Corro, Appellants v. Andres PEREZ, Perez & Malik, PLLC and Adriana Medrano of P
United States Court of International Trade · 2023-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 CIT 142
Slip Op. 23-142 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 21-00304 HYUNDAI STEEL CO., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and NUCOR CORPORATION, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge OPINION [The court grants judgment on the agency rec
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025-10-06 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-1498 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 10/06/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AG DER DILLINGER HUTTENWERKE, Plaintiff-Appellant ILSENBURGER GROBBLECH GMBH, SALZGITTER FLACHSTAHL GMBH, SALZGITTER MANNESMANN GROBBLECH GMBH, SALZGITTER MANNESMANN INTERNATIONAL GMBH, FRIEDR. LOHMANN GMBH, THYSSENKRUPP STEEL EUROPE AG, Plaintiffs
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 362 F. Supp. 3d 349
Elizabeth K. Dillon, United States District Judge Pending before the court is defendant Angel Orlando Vasquez Flores's motion to dismiss the indictment. (Dkt. No. 49.) Vasquez Flores, a citizen of Honduras, is charged in this case with a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, which requires the government to prove that he ha
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-04-13 · Published · cited 0× · 819 F.3d 256; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 6718; 2016 WL 1457892
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: The district court denied Arturo Ramirez-Salazar’s motion to dismiss his indictment for illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) as time-barred. Ramirez timely appealed. We AFFIRM. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Arturo Ramirez-Salazar is a citizen of Mexico. In November 2000, United States Bor
Supreme Court of the United States · 1981-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 451 U.S. 970; 101 S. Ct. 2047; 68 L. Ed. 2d 349; 49 U.S.L.W. 3824; 1981 U.S. LEXIS 1941
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013-03-19 · Published · cited 3× · 712 F.3d 203; 2013 WL 1135808
PRADO, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Osvaldo Compian-Torres was convicted of illegally reentering the country. He appealed his conviction, and this Court affirmed. We granted a motion for rehearing and now affirm. I Osvaldo Compian-Torres (“Compian”) is a Mexican citizen who was removed from the United States in 1998 after a
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2005-10-18 · Published · cited 4× · 395 F. Supp. 2d 422; 2006 A.M.C. 1636; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24054; 2005 WL 2651196
395 F.Supp.2d 422 (2005) Carrie A. MCMELLON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. 3:00 CV 0582. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia. Huntington Division. October 18, 2005. *423 *424 *425 Todd M. Powers, Schro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-50441 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-02-01147-SVW- GARY DONALD BARKEN, 02 Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ce
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007-02-06 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 05-2596 & 05-2633 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLAUDE WILEY, JR. and TATU M. BROWN, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008-07-07 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 07-1546 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KEITH A. ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wiscons
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005-12-29 · Published · cited 40× · 434 F.3d 794; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28887; 2005 WL 3544682
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Aquiles Alvarado-Santilano (“Alvarado”) appeals his sentence for illegal reentry after deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court found that Alvarado had been previously convicted of an aggravated felony, determined that the statutory maximum sentence was therefore twenty years as opposed to two, and increased Alvarad
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005-12-22 · Published · cited 37× · 434 F.3d 345; 2005 WL 3489542
KING, Chief Judge: Arturo Vargas-Garcia, the defendant-appellant in this matter, appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court. We AFFIRM. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On October 12, 2004, Arturo Vargas-Garcia was arrested in Dallas by special agents from the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Vargas-G
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003-10-09 · Published · cited 0×
Rehearing en banc granted by order filed 10/8/03; opinion filed 8/1/03 is vacated Filed: August 18, 2003 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1494 (CA-00-582-3) Carrie A. McMellon, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus United States of America, et al.,