Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Corro”
United States v. Corro-Balbuenapublic domain
DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: Corro-Balbuena appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found present in the United States without permission after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Corro-Balbuena pleaded guilty and was sentenced, on his own motion and over the government’s objection, without a presentence report or formal recommendation from the proba
United States v. Martinez-Corropublic domain
PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Martinez-Corro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v, California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Martinez-Corro has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Martinez-Corro’s response discloses no non-frivolous issue for
Corro v. Stephenspublic domain
Former decision, 134 S.Ct. 477.Petition for rehearing denied.
Corro v. Stephenspublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Elisned Corro-Barragan v. Eric H. Holder Jr.public domain
OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: This petition raises a matter of first impression in the Ninth Circuit regarding the interpretation of “physically present” in the voluntary departure provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1229e(b)(l)(A). We interpret physically present in this provision as requiring uninterrupted presence
Daniel Villarreal Corro v. United Statespublic domain
COFFIN, Chief Judge. Appellant, a Colombian citizen, was convicted in the District Court for Puerto Rico of the purchase of cocaine not in or from the original stamped package in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4704, of receiving and concealing cocaine knowing it to have been brought into the United States contrary to law in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174,
Jose Corro and Concepcion Corro v. Andres Perez, Perez & Malik, PLLC and Adriana Medrano of Perez & Malikpublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00688-CV Jose CORRO and Concepcion Corro, Appellants v. Andres PEREZ, Perez & Malik, PLLC and Adriana Medrano of P
Hyundai Steel Co. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 23-142 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 21-00304 HYUNDAI STEEL CO., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and NUCOR CORPORATION, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge OPINION [The court grants judgment on the agency rec
Ag Der Dillinger Huttenwerke v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 24-1498 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 10/06/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AG DER DILLINGER HUTTENWERKE, Plaintiff-Appellant ILSENBURGER GROBBLECH GMBH, SALZGITTER FLACHSTAHL GMBH, SALZGITTER MANNESMANN GROBBLECH GMBH, SALZGITTER MANNESMANN INTERNATIONAL GMBH, FRIEDR. LOHMANN GMBH, THYSSENKRUPP STEEL EUROPE AG, Plaintiffs
United States v. Vasquez Florespublic domain
Elizabeth K. Dillon, United States District Judge Pending before the court is defendant Angel Orlando Vasquez Flores's motion to dismiss the indictment. (Dkt. No. 49.) Vasquez Flores, a citizen of Honduras, is charged in this case with a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, which requires the government to prove that he ha
United States v. Arturo Ramirez-Salazarpublic domain
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: The district court denied Arturo Ramirez-Salazar’s motion to dismiss his indictment for illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) as time-barred. Ramirez timely appealed. We AFFIRM. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Arturo Ramirez-Salazar is a citizen of Mexico. In November 2000, United States Bor
Corros v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Osvaldo Compian-Torrespublic domain
PRADO, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Osvaldo Compian-Torres was convicted of illegally reentering the country. He appealed his conviction, and this Court affirmed. We granted a motion for rehearing and now affirm. I Osvaldo Compian-Torres (“Compian”) is a Mexican citizen who was removed from the United States in 1998 after a
McMellon v. United Statespublic domain
395 F.Supp.2d 422 (2005) Carrie A. MCMELLON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. 3:00 CV 0582. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia. Huntington Division. October 18, 2005. *423 *424 *425 Todd M. Powers, Schro
United States v. Barkenpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 03-50441 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-02-01147-SVW- GARY DONALD BARKEN, 02 Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ce
United States v. Wiley, Claudepublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 05-2596 & 05-2633 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLAUDE WILEY, JR. and TATU M. BROWN, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States District Court
United States v. Roberts, Keith A.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 07-1546 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KEITH A. ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wiscons
United States v. Alvarado-Santilanopublic domain
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Aquiles Alvarado-Santilano (“Alvarado”) appeals his sentence for illegal reentry after deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court found that Alvarado had been previously convicted of an aggravated felony, determined that the statutory maximum sentence was therefore twenty years as opposed to two, and increased Alvarad
United States v. Vargas-Garciapublic domain
KING, Chief Judge: Arturo Vargas-Garcia, the defendant-appellant in this matter, appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court. We AFFIRM. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On October 12, 2004, Arturo Vargas-Garcia was arrested in Dallas by special agents from the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Vargas-G
McMellon v. United Statespublic domain
Rehearing en banc granted by order filed 10/8/03; opinion filed 8/1/03 is vacated Filed: August 18, 2003 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1494 (CA-00-582-3) Carrie A. McMellon, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus United States of America, et al.,