Cases

CCA 1373. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to May 14, 2014.

PER CURIAM. Jesus Corral directly appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute more than 500 grams of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(vm), and 846. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief citing Anders v. California 386

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Gustavo Eraclio Corral-Garda (Corral) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Corral has filed a response and a supplemental response. The record is insufficiently deve

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sergio Corral-Chavira (Corral) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Corral has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rele

339 F.Supp.2d 781 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lorena CORRAL, Defendant. No. EP-04-CR-543-PRM. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. October 1, 2004. *782 *783 *784 Stephen G. Jurecky, U.S. Attorneys Office, El Paso,

362 F.Supp.2d 1143 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Javier A. CORRAL, Defendant. Javier A. Corral, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent. No. C1-02-051, No. A1-04-144. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division. March 30, 2005. *1144 Javier A. Corral, Sheridan, OR,

MEMORANDUM * Defendant Corral was sentenced in November 1996 for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. On appeal in April 1999, we remanded the case for re-sentencing. Corral was re-sentenced in November 2000. Corral now claims that 1) the trial court should have conducted an on-the-record inquiry into his assertion of an attorney-client conflict and that the trial court’s referral of the change-of-cou

381 F.Supp.2d 1286 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ricardo CORRAL-ALVAREZ, Defendant. No. CR 04-2019 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. March 18, 2005. *1287 David C. Iglesias, United States Attorney for the District of New Mexico, Norman Cairns, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 02-1493 & 02-1734 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FERNANDO CORRAL and FERNANDO LOPEZ, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the

983 F.2d 232 U.S.v.Corral* NO. 91-7195 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Jan 05, 1993 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2

888 F.2d 1390 U.S.v.Corral* NO. 89-1227 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. OCT 18, 1989 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex. 2

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

702 F.Supp. 1539 (1988) The UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Rene CORRAL-CORRAL and Cesar Garcia, Defendants. No. CR88-0039J. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. December 21, 1988. *1540 Lisa Leschuck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Cheyenne, Wyo., for plaintiff. Glenn A. Duncan, Laramie, Wyo., for defendants.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

St. Eve, Circuit Judge. Seventeen years after Eleazar Corral Valenzuela (Corral) was convicted of aggravated criminal sexual abuse of a minor family member in Illinois state court, the United States filed a civil complaint to revoke his naturalized citizenship and cancel his certificate of naturalization.

Petition for rehearing denied.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2789 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ELEAZAR CORRAL VALENZUELA, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for t

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fernando Ramirez-Corral has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ramirez-Corral has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fernando Ramirez-Corral has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ramirez-Corral has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,