⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Contreras”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-01-13 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 23-50840 Document: 95-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit _____________ FILED January 13, 2025 No. 23-50840
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2022-05-16 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, BAKER, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Paulina I. CONTRERAS Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021-10-29 · Published · cited 1× · 16 F.4th 479
Case: 21-50500 Document: 00516074331 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/29/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 29, 2021
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017-08-18 · Published · cited 0× · 695 F. App'x 821
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Arturo, Contreras has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Contreras has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-10-18 · Published · cited 0× · 670 F. App'x 383
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Mario Contreras has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance -with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Contreras has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016-09-22 · Published · cited 0×
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600192 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. BRYAN J. CONTRERAS Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
District Court, W.D. New York · 2016-11-01 · Published · cited 0× · 216 F. Supp. 3d 299; 2016 WL 6436664; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151327
*301DECISION AND ORDER HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is before the Court on Defendant Julio Contreras’ motions for severance and an immediate trial. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the motions. BACKGROUND Contreras is one of five Defendants charged in a fif
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-10-18 · Published · cited 0× · 669 F. App'x 760
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Pablo Contreras has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Contreras has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the reco
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019-01-17 · Published · cited 26× · 913 F.3d 232
KATZMANN, Judge. After pleading guilty to a charge of possessing a machine gun in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (o), the uncontested presentence report("PSR") placed defendant-appellant Angel Rafael Contreras-Delgado ("Contreras-Delgado") in a federal guidelin
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016-01-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before D.C. KING, B.T. PALMER, D.A. NORKIN Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AARON E. CONTRERAS PRIVATE (E-1), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 20150
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before R.Q. WARD, J.A. FISCHER, D.J. SMITH Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK A. CONTRERAS AIRCREW SURVIVAL EQUIPMENTMAN THIRD CLASS (E-4), U.S. NAVY NMCCA
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-09-02 · Published · cited 0× · 668 F. App'x 586
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Abraham Contreras-Armen-daris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011), Contreras-Armendaris has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief an
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-12-20 · Published · cited 0× · 672 F. App'x 426
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Angel De Jesus Contreras-Almanza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Contreras-Almanza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief an
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 377 F. App'x 552
ORDER Between July and November 2007, Luis Contreras and his codefendant, Corey *553Williams, sold three guns to an undercover federal agent. After his arrest Contreras confessed to pai'ticipating in these sales. He also admitted to selling cocaine since 2000 and to participating in over 10 shootings as a “leading member” of the Latin Saints street gang. Contreras currently is
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 351 F. App'x 216
MEMORANDUM ** Cesar S. Contreras appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following modification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. *217§ 3582(c)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Contreras’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as cou
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 377 F. App'x 552
ORDER Between July and November 2007, Luis Contreras and his codefendant, Corey *553Williams, sold three guns to an undercover federal agent. After his arrest Contreras confessed to pai'ticipating in these sales. He also admitted to selling cocaine since 2000 and to participating in over 10 shootings as a “leading member” of the Latin Saints street gang. Contreras currently is
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 348 F. App'x 263
MEMORANDUM ** Froylan Contreras appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress. Because the district court did not clearly err in finding that the contraband at issue inevitably would have been discovered, we affirm. “We review de novo motions to suppress, and any factual findings made at the suppression hearing for clear error.” United States v. Negrete-
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 351 F. App'x 216
MEMORANDUM ** Cesar S. Contreras appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following modification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. *217§ 3582(c)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Contreras’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as cou
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 69 M.J. 120; 2010 CAAF LEXIS 732; 2010 WL 2606312
BAKER, Judge (concurring in the result): I agree with the conclusion in this case: the offense of indecent acts as charged under clause 1 or 2 of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2006), is not a purely military offense. However, I disagree with the Court’s analysis in reaching this conclusion. In particular, the majority adopts an “elements test” t
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-09-17 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-50126 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  DC No. 2:06-cr-00353 SJO KATIE SUE CONTRERAS, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the U