⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Coastal Waterproof”

District Court, S.D. New York · 1995-11-03 · Published · cited 5× · 903 F. Supp. 591; 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 505; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16662; 1995 WL 656514
903 F.Supp. 591 (1995) COASTAL AVIATION, INC., Plaintiffs, v. COMMANDER AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Defendant. No. 92 CV 4229 (BDP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 3, 1995. *592 John A. Tartaglia, White Plains, NY, for plaintiff. Philip M. Halpern, Pirro Collier Cohen Crystal & Bock, White Plains, NY, Rich
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008-11-24 · Published · cited 0× · 593 F. Supp. 2d 1306; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106750; 2008 WL 5521315
ORDER ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge. This civil suit is before the Court for determination of remedies for the Defendants’ failure to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4347, (“NEPA”) when preparing (1) Supplemental Environment Impact Statements (“SEISs”) which supplemented certain Vegetation Management Environmental Impact Statements (‘VMEISs”) and (2) 20
District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999-02-11 · Published · cited 0× · 55 F. Supp. 2d 1362; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10616; 1999 WL 499122
55 F.Supp.2d 1362 (1999) UNITED STATES of America v. Antonio Fredy DIAZ, Jacinto Torres, Rudesindo Viveros, Francisco Zubiria, Defendants. No. 98-663-CR-DAVIS. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. February 11, 1999. Michael Mullaney, Assistant United States Attorney, Miami, FL, for plaintiff. Philip Horowitz, Miami, Fla., Alvin Entin, Fort Lauderdale,
District Court, D. Delaware · 1990-02-02 · Published · cited 13× · 729 F. Supp. 1461; 20 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20737; 31 ERC (BNA) 1060; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1356; 1990 WL 10139
729 F.Supp. 1461 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION; Sea-Port Services, Ltd., formerly Sealand, Ltd.; Oil Industries, Ltd.; Wayne Hawkins; Chem Clear, Inc.; Coopers Creek Chemical Corporation; Penn Fuel Gas, Inc.; Philadelphia Gas Works; Public Service Electric and Gas Company; and National Industrial Services, Inc., f/k/a Maine Coastal Service, Defendants. PENN FUEL GAS, INC.; Consolidated Rail Corpo
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015-03-31 · Published · cited 15× · 101 F. Supp. 3d 584; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41304
OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. The above referenced cause alleges breach of contract, breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, and violations of §§ 541.006(a) (unfair settlement practices) and 542.051 et seq. (prompt payment of claims) of the Texas Insurance Code and of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”) §§ 17.41 et seq. (engaging in “false, misleadi
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987-11-30 · Published · cited 2× · 834 F.2d 1533
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. I. Summary These consolidated actions were brought by subcontractors against the prime contractor Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (“Western”) and its bonding company, seeking, inter alia, contract and quantum meruit damages relating to their work on construction of a live fire range at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico. The project involved federal cont
United States Court of Claims · 1972-02-18 · Published · cited 0× · 197 Ct. Cl. 450; 455 F.2d 556; 1972 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 23
Per Curiam : This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Saul Richard Gamer with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Rule 134(h). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on October 7, 1971. No exceptions to or brief on this opinion and report have been filed by the parties and the times for so filing pursuant to the rules of the court
District Court, District of Columbia · 1975-09-12 · Published · cited 31× · 405 F. Supp. 904; 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16222
405 F.Supp. 904 (1975) UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of Leonardo MARIANA, Plaintiff, v. PIRACCI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC, and Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 75-0342. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 12, 1975. Francis J. Pelland, Herman M. Braude, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. Harold F.
District Court, D. Maryland · 1956-06-05 · Published · cited 0× · 141 F. Supp. 608; 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3337
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge. On August 12, 1955, at about 2:30 p. m., the sailing vessel Levin J. Marvel (Marvel) capsized and sank in Herring Bay on the Western shore of Chesapeake Bay, with the loss of 14 of her 23 passengers. Thereafter, a two-count indictment was returned against the defendant, John H. Meckling, the Marvel’s master and part owner. The first count was brought under U.S.C. Title 18, § 1115, for misco
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987-11-30 · Published · cited 33× · 834 F.2d 1533
834 F.2d 1533 34 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) 75,407 The UNITED STATES of America, for the Use of C.J.C., INC., aNew Mexico corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.WESTERN STATES MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., a New Mexicocorporation; Commercial Union Insurance Co., aMassachusetts corporation; and Sandia Corporation, a NewMexico corporation, d/b/a Sandia National Laboratories,Defendants-Appellants.UNI
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023-04-05 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals BEI-BEACH, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Mashburn Christman, JV, Lend Lease (US) Construction, Inc., f/k/a Bovis Lend Lease, Inc., and McCrory Construction Company, LLC, Defendants, v. Mashburn Christman, JV, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Wallcraft Construction, Inc.; Alpha Insulation & Waterproofing, Inc.; Baker Roofing, Inc.; Collins & Wright, Inc.; Liberty Mutual Insurance Company; Old Republic Surety Company; Hartford Fire Insuran
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022-11-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-747 No. COA22-19 Filed 15 November 2022 Moore County, No. 19-CVS-998 THE ASCOT CORPORATION, LLC; and HERONSBROOK, LLC; Plaintiffs, v. I&R WATERPROOFING, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. TREMCO BARRIER SOLUTIONS, INC.; TANGLEWOOD LANDSCAPING, LLC;
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022-11-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-747 No. COA22-19 Filed 15 November 2022 Moore County, No. 19-CVS-998 THE ASCOT CORPORATION, LLC; and HERONSBROOK, LLC; Plaintiffs, v. I&R WATERPROOFING, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. TREMCO BARRIER SOLUTIONS, INC.; TANGLEWOOD LANDSCAPING, LLC;
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2003-02-20 · Published · cited 15× · 57 Mass. App. Ct. 397; 783 N.E.2d 842
Duefly, J. After our decision in this matter, see 55 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (2002), issued pursuant to Appeals Court Rule 1:28, as amended, 46 Mass. App. Ct. 1001 (1998), we granted the petitions for rehearing submitted by three of the defendants, and heard argument thereon on November 26, 2002. Our earlier decision, reversing in part the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claims as not timely filed, was in connection with the plaintiff
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-01-06 · Published · cited 108× · 57 F.4th 85
21-2733 Admiral Ins. Co. v. Niagara Transformer Corp. United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2021 Argued: May 3, 2022 Decided: January 6, 2023 No. 21-2733 ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-07-19 · Published · cited 5× · 325 F. Supp. 3d 466
*467FOR PLAINTIFF CITY OF NEW YORK: Zachary W. Carter, Susan E. Amron, Kathleen C. Schmid, Margaret C. Holden, Noah Kazis, CORPORATION COUNSEL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Steve W. Berman, Matthew F. Pawa, Benjamin A. Krass, Wesley Kelman, HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP, Christopher A. Seeger, Stephen A. Weiss, Diogenes P. Kekatos, SEEGER WEISS LLP. FOR DEF
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017-03-20 · Published · cited 16× · 243 F. Supp. 3d 1290; 2017 WL 1063449; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39507
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND . DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FEDERICO A. MORENO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ' This case is a products liability class action brought by owners of various rifles manufactured by Century Arms, Inc., Century International Arms Corporation, Century Arms of Vermont, Inc., and Century International Arms of Vermont, Inc, (collectively, “Century”). Plaintiffs all
California Court of Appeal · 2018-03-15 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 3/15/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DON'T CELL OUR PARKS, D071863 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2015-00026359- CU-TT-CTL) CITY OF SAN DIE
Miralda v. Gonzalezpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-02-04 · Published · cited 29× · 160 So. 3d 998; 2015 WL 469015
ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. Lin this legal malpractice action, the plaintiff, Marco Tulio Miralda, appeals the trial court’s judgment granting the peremptory exception .of peremption filed by the defendants, Romauldo Gonzalez, Sr., and the Law Offices of Romauldo Gonzalez, L.L.C. d/b/a Braden Gonzalez and Associates (collectively “Mr. Gonzalez”). Because we find the trial court properly applied the one-year peremptive period se
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2018-03-15 · Published · cited 19× · 230 Cal. Rptr. 3d 294; 21 Cal. App. 5th 338
NARES, J. *297*344San Diego City Charter section 55 (Charter 55) provides that real property formally dedicated in perpetuity "for park, recreation or cemetery purposes shall not be used for any but park, recreation or cemetery purposes without such chang