Cases

PRATT, Circuit Judge: Defendants appeal their convictions on charges relating to their embezzlement of welfare funds from Local 377 of United Services Employees Union. On appeal they raise numerous issues, including claims that (1) they were charged and convicted of several crimes that arose out of a single pattern of conduct; (2) the district court’s charge to the jury on str

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Chief Judge. This is a timely appeal by defendant Cloyd L. Unverzagt from his conviction by a jury and the resulting sentence upon an information which charged him with receiving, concealing and retaining stolen money orders with intent to convert them to his own use in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 641.

409 F.2d 846 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Cloyd Samuel RICHARDSON, Jr., Appellant. No. 13133. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued May 5, 1969. Decided May 13, 1969. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlott

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Nick Cloyd Enterline appeals from his conviction by a jury on two counts of transporting in interstate commerce a motor vehicle, knowing that it was stolen, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §~ 2312 and 2(b) (1988), and on two counts of possessing with the intent to sell a motor vehicle, knowing that its identification number had been removed or otherwise altered, in viola

DEVITT, Senior District Judge. Appellant was indicted for armed bank robbery (18 U.S.C. §~ 2113(a) and (d)), use of a firearm during a bank robbery (18 U.S.C. § 924(c)), and possession of a firearm following a felony conviction (18 U.S. C.App. § 1202(a)(1)). Several days before the trial the government filed an information of prior convictions. Following appellant's conviction on all

238 B.R. 328 (1999) In the Matter of Jerald Daemyon CLOYD, a/k/a Jerald Daemyon, Debtors, v. GRP RECORDS, Creditor. Bankruptcy No. 98-52006. Adversary No. 98-4707. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 18, 1999. *329 *330 Nancy A. Nihem, Schneider, Miller &

ENTRY ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT L. BAYT, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion for Summary Judgement”), filed by Casey D. Cloyd (“Creditor”) on October 23, 1997, and on the affidavit by the Creditor (“Affidavit”), attached as an exhibit to the Motion for Summary Judgment.1 Sami D. Al

CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge. Clifton Cloyd appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Cloyd contends that the motion court plainly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial as a result of trial counsel’s failure to timely object to the introduction of four photographs of guns seized from his residence. T

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge. Mark Anthony Cloyd and Leslie Love appeal their convictions pursuant to a jury verdict returned on January 17, 1980, finding them guilty of bank robbery in violation *1149 of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) (1976).

BROWNING, Circuit Judge. Appellant was convicted of refusing to be inducted into the armed forces in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. We affirm. Appellant registered with Local Board Nq. 118 in .Santa Rosa, California, but was permitted to complete his registration process in the nearby community of Petalu

943 So.2d 149 (2006) Thomas Porter CLOYD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D05-1816. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 12, 2006. Rehearing and Rehearing Denied December 22, 2006. *155 William L. Richey; Daniel Foodman and Eugene H. Lindsey, Miami; and James K. Rubin, Nort

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Excise Taxes; 26 U.S.C. §§ 6416, 6427, 6675 (2012); Treas. Reg. §§ 48.6416(b)(2)-3 (1985), 48.6427-9 (as amended in 2000); Failure to Keep Tax Exemption Certificates as Required by Statute and Regulation; No Penalties Because Reasonable Cause for Failure Exists. OPINION AND ORDER Bush, Senior Judge. This case

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ________________ No. 06-4103 ________________ Cloyd Hepp, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Lilia S. Hepp, Widow of Cloyd * Hepp,

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 17, 2006 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shum

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-04-00048-CR ___________________

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting, joined by LAY, Chief Judge, and HEANEY and FAGG, Circuit Judges. I respectfully dissent. The court today makes clear that it views the language and structure of the ACCA, 18 U.S.C.App. § 1202(a), as inconclusive as to whether the Act is a sentencing enhancement or a new offense. While the court states that the weight of legislative history supports

332 S.W.3d 91 (2010) NORTHERN KENTUCKY AREA PLANNING COMMISSION and Dennis A. Gordon, Appellant, v. Russell CLOYD, Appellee. No. 2008-CA-001104-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. January 15, 2010. Discretionary Review Denied by Supreme Court March 16, 2011. *92 Jason V. Reed, Covington, KY, for appellant. K