Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Cleveland”
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss *1219Counts 1 and 5 of the Indictment, filed September 24, 2018 (Doc. 72)("Motion"). The primary issues are whether: (i) a Navajo Nation Department of Public Safety ("NDPS") officer, Houston Largo, was a fe
United States v. Cleveland White Featherpublic domain
SYKES, Circuit Judge. Cleveland White Feather killed his cellmate, Robert Running Bear, in their cell at the federal prison in Marion, Illinois. He did this by disemboweling the victim using a disassembled Bic razor, having first choked him into unconsciousness during a late-night fight of rather opaque origins. White Feather was charged with murder by a federal prisoner,
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Troy V. Cleveland appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion construed as a request for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. A
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
135 F.3d 145 U.S.v.Cleveland* NO. 97-6125 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Jan 09, 1998 Appeal From: M.D.Ala. ,No.9600156CRN2 1 Affirmed.
United States v. Cleveland Swintpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Cleveland Swint (Swint) pleaded guilty to one count of knowingly using and trafficking in unauthorized access devices to obtain things of value aggregating more than $1,000 during a one-year period, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029(a)(2) & 2. He entered into a written plea agreement wi
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: The Times-Picayune Publishing Corporation (publisher of the New Orleans Times-Picayune ), Capital City Press (publisher of the Baton Rouge Advocate), Michael Perl-stein (a Times-Picayune reporter), and Joe Gyan (an Advocate reporter) (collectively, “the newspapers”) complain th
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
132 F.3d 46 U.S.v.Cleveland* NO. 96-7063 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec 02, 1997 Appeal From: M.D.Ala. ,No.9600074CRS 1 Affirmed.
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
964 F.Supp. 1073 (1997) UNITED STATES of America, v. Carl CLEVELAND, et al. Criminal Action No. 96-207. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. April 18, 1997. *1074 *1075 Anthony J. Marabella, Jr., Marabella & Moore, Stephen Bishop Street, Jr., Baton Rouge, LA, for Carl W. Cleveland
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
112 F.3d 1172 U.S.v.Cleveland* NO. 96-6142 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Apr 03, 1997 Appeal From: M.D.Ala. ,No.9500166CRTN 1 Affirmed.
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
951 F.Supp. 1249 (1997) UNITED STATES of America v. Carl W. CLEVELAND, Fred H. Goodson, Maria F. Goodson, Joe H. Morgan, Benjamin Bura Rayburn, Sr. aka "B.B. Sixty Rayburn" and Larry S. Bankston. Criminal Action No. 96-207. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. January 14, 1997. *1250 Anthony J. Marabella, Jr., Marabella
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge. Ramon E. Vasquez appeals from his conviction by a jury for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain physical evidence and in om
United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co.public domain
Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) and the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) impose excise taxes on employee wages to fund Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment compensation programs. This case concerns the application of FICA and FUTA taxes to payments of back wages. The Internal Revenue Service has consistently maintained that, for tax p
United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co.public domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.
Cleveland v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 24- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC., Plaintiff, and NUCOR CORPORATION, STEEL DYNAMICS, INC., and UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. Before: Gary S. Katzmann, Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 22-00257 Defendant,
United States v. Dockery Clevelandpublic domain
JOHN K. BUSH, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Defendant-Appellant Dockery Cleveland of conspiring and attempting to possess, as well as possessing, cocaine with the intent to distribute it. Cleveland's appeal raises whether the district court properly (1) admitted certain evidence extracted from his cellphone; (2) overruled a Batson objection to a peremptory juror ch
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
Opinion of the Court EVERETT, Chief Judge: Appellant was tried by a general court-martial with members at San Vito dei Normanni Air Station, Italy; and pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of stealing $3,337.89 from the United States, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921.1 The sentence adjudged was a bad-conduct discharge, 1
United States v. Cleveland Jeanes, Jr.public domain
37 F.3d 1501NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Cleveland JEANES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-1740. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circui
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
DECISION MURDOCK, Judge: This case illustrates how rebuttal evidence can be used to explain, rather than repel, counteract or disprove, testimony of the opposing side. The appellant was found guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of stealing more than $3,000 by falsely claiming he was geographically separated from his wife while he was stationed in Italy. In fact his wife was living with him and not, as he claimed, wi
Cleveland Assets, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
Per Curiam. ORDER Appellant Cleveland Assets, LLC, filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by appellee United States. The petition was first referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc was referred to t