Cases

USCA11 Case: 19-10332 Document: 302-1 Date Filed: 12/02/2024 Page: 1 of 142 19-10332 Opinion of the Court 1 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-10332 _______

USCA11 Case: 22-12792 Document: 76-1 Date Filed: 11/14/2025 Page: 1 of 56 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12792 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF

USCA11 Case: 19-11889 Date Filed: 02/12/2021 Page: 1 of 21 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 19-11889 D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cr-20885-RNS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

651 F.Supp.2d 784 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Matthew Francis NOLAN, Defendant. Case No. 08-M-97. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 31, 2009. *789 AUSA, Michael John Chmelar, United States Attorney's Office, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Daniel S. Klapman, Burke, Warren,

REVISED AUGUST 13, 2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-40632 July

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting, joined by EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge, and EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge, and joined as to parts LA, I.B, and I.D by EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: I respectfully dissent. For the first time ever, this court reverses a below-guideline sentence for alleged unfairness. And for at least the 181st time, it reverses a case on plain error, despite the Supreme C

501 F.Supp.2d 852 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Roberto HERNANDEZ-REYES, Defendant. No. EP-07-CR-519-PRM. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. June 7, 2007. *853 *854 Donna Svet Miller, Assistant U.S. Attorney, El Paso, TX, for Plaintiff. Edgar H. Holguin, Pu

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-50892 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-04-02255-MLH RAFAEL CRUZ-ESCOTO, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  App

EBEL, Circuit Judge. This case involves a prosecution under 8 U.S.C. § 1326, which makes it a crime to be present in the United States illegally after having been previously deported. Here, two border patrol agents, acting on an anonymous tip, stopped Gustavo Olivares — Rangel (“Defendant”) as he was leaving a trailer park and questioned him about his identity and citizenship. After Defendant admitted to being an illegal a

*1084SILER, Circuit Judge. Rafael Cruz-Escoto appeals his jury conviction and sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States without permission, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He presents six arguments on appeal: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict; (2) the district court improperly instructed the jury; (3) the district court vi

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: This appeal raises a number of issues concerning the use of a tax protest scheme designed to harass public officials and private individuals against whom some of the appellants had grievances. I On October 18, 1990, a grand jury sitting in the District of Hawaii returned a seventy-nine count indictment charging fifteen individuals with various violations

995 F.2d 1448 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Windyceslau D. LORENZO, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Roger ELVICK, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Nathan K. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ron KNUTT, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.T

ORDER BENSON, District Judge. This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Ronald N. Boyce pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On March 12, 1992, and March 18, 1992, the Magistrate Judge heard oral argument oh defendants’ motion to dismiss, motions in limine, and motions to suppress. On May 11, 1992, the Magistrate Judge issued an Order denying the motions in limine without prejudice. On May 18, 1992, h

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns a determination that a prosecutor’s exercise of peremptory challenges against Black and Hispanic members of a jury venire was not racially motivated. Horacio Alvarado appeals from the March 27, 1991, order of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York (John R. Bartels, Judge), reinstating a judgment of conviction af

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns primarily the implementation of the holdings in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), and McCray v. Abrams, 750 F.2d 1113 (2d Cir.1984), vacated and remanded, 478 U.S. 1001, 106 S.Ct. 3289, 92 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986), appeal dismiss

ALARCON, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether evidence that a witness is threatened with injury is sufficient to justify a delay in the disclosure of her identity. We hold that evidence that a witness’ safety is threatened constitutes good cause to grant an exception to the disclosure requirements of The Notice of Alibi Rule. Fed.R.Crim.P. 12.1. Eural W

660 F.Supp. 1340 (1987) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. HATO REY BUILDING COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 79-1669. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 5, 1987. *1341 Assistant U.S. Atty. Fidel A. Sevillano, Daniel López-Romo, U.S. Atty., San Juan, P.R., for plaintiff. Hiram Martínez López,

Filed 2/20/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D080114 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD287842) GEORGE THOMAS ROUSTON, JR., Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior

Filed 4/16/19 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THE PEOPLE, B286117 Plaintiff and Respondent, (L.A. Super. Ct. No. BA447145) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION OSCAR MEDINA et al., AND D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER GUY JASSO, Defendant and Appellant. S179454 Riverside County Superior Court INF047207 April 3, 2025 Justice Kruger authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and Justi