Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Roberto Chavez-Valencia appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence imposed for attempted reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and aggravated identity theft, in violation of U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(l). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Chavez-Valencia’s

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Juan Fernando Chavez-Valencia appeals his conviction, contending that certain evidence should have been suppressed at trial. We hold that because Chavez failed to file a pretrial motion to suppress in accordance with Rule 12(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, he has waived the point for appeal and we are barred from considering it. C

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ALARCON, Circuit Judge: Felipe Valencia Chavez appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction for two counts of possession of heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Chavez asks for reversal of his conviction on two grounds: (1) the district court erred in denying his motion to admit a diagram into evidence for purposes of impeaching a Go

277 P.3d 475 (2012) 2012-NMCA-044 LOS CHAVEZ COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. VALENCIA COUNTY and the Board of County Commissioners, Respondents, and John Whisenant and Elias Barela, Interested Parties-Appellants. Nos. 30,458, 30,459. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. March 20, 2012. *47

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 09:23:09 2012.05.09 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2012-NMCA-044 Filing Date: March 20, 2012 Docket N

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, ) ) 2 CA-CR 2002-0202 Appellee, ) DEPARTMENT A ) v. ) OPINION

*1132 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Joint Motion to Compel Specific Discovery, filed August 30, 2013 (Doc. 334) (“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on April 17, 2014. The primary issue is whether the Court should compel Plaintiff United States of Am

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Valencia Farias has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Farias has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for lea

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

Case: 22-30442 Document: 00516988587 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/04/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2957 MICHAEL DEWAYNE LAIRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 22-2196, 22-2368 ____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES PERRIN, Appellant 22-2196 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PRICE MONTGOMERY,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-1939 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SUNNY SOK, Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (District Court No. 2-19-cr-00348-001) District Judge: Honorable Mitchell S. Goldberg

FILED Appellate Case: 19-3256 Document: 010110690141 United Date Filed: States CourtPage: 05/27/2022 of Appeals 1 Tenth Circuit

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, AMENDED OPINION *

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 3, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk o

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH September 30, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court