Cases

CHARLOTTE'S OFFICE BOUTIQUE, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentCharlotte's Office Boutique, Inc. v. Comm'rNo. 5077-01 United States Tax Court

505 F.Supp.2d 1377 (2007) In Re: CHARLOTTE RUSSE, INC., Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (Facta) Litigation Frida Najarian v. Charlotte Russe, Inc., et al., C.D. California, C.A. 2:07-501 Alison Lampenfeld v. Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc., et al., W.D. Pennsylvania, C.A. No. 2:07-355 No. MDL 1864. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. August 30, 2

ORDER Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge This matter is before the Court on three motions: (1) Defendants BlueWave, Dent, and Johnson’s Motion to Quash FDCPA Prejudgment Remedies (Dkt. No. 277); (2) a Motion to Quash by Blue Eagle Farming, LLC, Eagle Ray Investments, LLC, Forse Investments, LLC, and War-Horse Properties, LLLP (collectively, the “Johnson-related Entities”) (Dkt. No. 274)

ORDER Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge This consolidated False Claims Act (“FCA”) action stems from three independently filed qui tam complaints. Relator Michael Mayes filed a qui tam complaint in June 2011, Relator Chris Riedel filed a qui tam complaint in December 2011, and Relators Scarlett Lutz and Kayla Webster filed a qui tam complaint in 2013.

Pre-award bid protest; jurisdiction; standing; brand-name, sole-source procurement; Competition in Contracting Act, 41 U.S.C. § 3301; 10 U.S.C. § 2304(a)(1); factors governing equitable relief; interests of national defense and national security; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(3) OPINION AND ORDER 1 LETTOW, Judge.

OPINION THOMAS, Chief Judge: We are asked to decide whether certain allegations of fraud, some of which were known before the parties settled and some of which came to light after settlement, rise to the level of fraud on the court such that relief from the settlement agreement is warranted under Federal Rule of Civil

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta

288 B.R. 715 (2003) In re CHARLOTTE COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC., Debtor. Charlotte Commercial Group, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Fleet National Bank, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-52684, Adversary No. 01-6044W. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina, Winston-Salem Division. February 3, 2003. *716 David Meschan, Greensboro, NC,

682 F.Supp.2d 761 (2010) UNITED STATES AVIATION UNDERWRITERS INC., as aviation managers for United States Aircraft Insurance Group ("USAIG"), its participating insurers ACE American Insurance Company, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Zurich Aviation Insurance Company, a/s/o The Jet Place, Inc. d/b/a Business Jet Services, Inc., Billie Dickson, Charisse Lynette Groennieer, Keith Dickson, Sandra Lee DeSalvo, Ann Charlotte

ORDER MALCOLM J. HOWARD, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant the United States of America’s (“government”) second motion to dismiss [DE # 33]. Plaintiff has responded, and the government has replied. This matter is ripe for adjudication. BACKGROUND In March 2012, plaintiff brought suit, on behalf of decedent Libardo Anthony

ORDER and OPINION Richard M. Gergel, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant BlueWave Healthcare Consultants, Inc.’s (“BlueWave”) motion to dismiss1 Relator/Plaintiff Chris Riedel’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 9(b), 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 293.) For the reasons below, BlueWave’s motion to

United States Court of Federal Claims Rules 12(b)(6), 59, 60; Motion for New Trial or to Alter or Amend Judgment; Fifth Amendment Taking; La. Civ. Code Ann. art. 690, et seq.; Property Interest; Predial Servitude. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL OR ALTERNATIVELY TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT WILLIAMS, Judge.

904 F.Supp. 482 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Taylor Home of Charlotte, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant. No. 3:94CV-394-MU. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. November 2, 1995. *483 Harvey L. Handley, Sharon Bradford Franklin

Fifth Amendment Taking; Closure of Waterway Outlet; Property Interest; Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon Which Relief Can Be Granted; Rule 12(b)(6); La. Civ. Code Ann. art. 690, et seq.; Predial Servitude; Enclosed Estate; Regulatory Taking; Lack of Property Interest in Deep-Draft Access; Lack of Direct Regulation of Private Property. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

702 F.Supp.2d 909 (2010) UNITED STATES of America and the State of Tennessee ex rel., Karen J. Hobbs, Plaintiffs, v. MEDQUEST ASSOCIATES, INC., BioImaging at Charlotte, Inc.; BioImaging of Coolsprings, Inc., and BioImaging at Harding, Inc., now known as BioImaging at Edmondson, Defendants. No. 3:06-1169. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. March 24

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1322 Doc: 37 Filed: 11/01/2022 Pg: 1 of 10 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1322 CITIES4LIFE, INC., a/k/a Cities4Life Charlotte; DANIEL PARKS; KATHERINE A. HELDRETH, individually and on behalf of her minor son, N.H.; ELIJAH BOYER; PATRI

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Ledford, and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Ledf

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAMS, Judge. In this post-award bid protest, Ceres Environmental Services, Inc. (“Ceres”) challenges the award of contracts made by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) in two geographic regions, Regions 6a and 6b covering Hawaii and Alaska, respectively, following a reeompetition directed by this Court in AshBritt, Inc. v. United States, 87 Fed.Cl. 344 (2009

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-2068 CHARLOTTE ROBINSON and BOBBY DON BOWERSOCK as co-personal representatives of the Estate of Georgia J. Bowersock, deceased, and MARK BOWERSOCK, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DAVOL INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.,

OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. MedQuest Associates, Inc. and three of its subsidiaries (collectively “MedQuest”) appeal an $11,110,662.71 judgment against them for filing false claims for reimbursement under Medicare Part B in this False Claims Act (FCA) qui tarn action. The claims fall into two categories: (1) claims that were false