Cases

No. 18-1841 United States v. Chandler In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ______________ August Term, 2021 (Argued: December 7, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2022) Docket No. 18-1841

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Kevin S. CHANDLER, Airman Basic United States Air Force, Appellant No. 20-0168 Crim. App. No. S32534 Argued November 18, 20

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On June 16, 2015, the United States filed a superseding indictment against the Defendant Andre Chandler, also known as “Mac Dre” (the “Defendant”), charging him with: (a) one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); (b) one count of discharge of a firearm during and in relation to a drug traffickin

ORDER The parties’ joint motion is GRANTED. Chandler’s sentence is vacated in light of Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), and the case is remanded to the district court for resentencing. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

MEMORANDUM ** Mitchell James Chandler appeals from his jury-trial conviction for attempted escape in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying two of Chandler’s motions to continue the jury trial, and granting only a one-day continuance in response to a third motion to con

MEMORANDUM ** Mitchell James Chandler appeals from his jury-trial conviction for attempted escape in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying two of Chandler’s motions to continue the jury trial, and granting only a one-day continuance in response to a third motion to con

534 F.3d 45 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Isaac Nathaniel CHANDLER, Defendant, Appellant. No. 07-1583. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard February 5, 2008. Decided July 18, 2008. *46 Donald C. Lockhart, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Robert Clark Corrente, United Sta

MEMORANDUM * In No. 06-30178, Defendant Mitchell Chandler appeals the district court’s denial of a motion to withdraw his guilty plea to a charge of second-degree murder, and he appeals his sentence. In No. 06-30415, Defendant brings an interlocutory appeal of the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment for attempted escape. We affirm.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0347p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

HILL, Circuit Judge: The government charged defendants in the Middle District of Florida with conspiring to commit mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Defendants herein proceeded to trial and were found guilty. Each filed a motion for a judgment of acquittal, which the district court denied. Each appeals that denial. I. This trial clearly , demonstrates the inherent danger

291 F.Supp.2d 1204 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Cecil W. CHANDLER III, Defendant. Nos. 98-40044-01, 00-3382-RDR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 16, 2003. *1205 *1206 *1207 Norman Wesley Quarles, Pro se, Forrest City, AR

Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-14-2003 USA v. Chandler Precedential or Non-Precedenti

MEMORANDUM ** Eric Chandler and Michael Ketcher appeal their respective criminal judgments imposed following their guilty pleas to uttering fictitious obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 514(a)(1). The applicable maximum supervised release term was five years, but the plea agreements recited, and the district court reiterated during the change of plea hearings, a maximum supervised release term of thre

220 F.Supp.2d 165 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, v. Carrie L. CHANDLER a/k/a, "Gail T. Wilson," a/k/a "Amy L. Glasper," a/k/a "Amy L. Walker," a/k/a "Carrie L. White," Defendant. No. 92-CR-679 (ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 19, 2002. *166 Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, Central Islip,

18 F.Supp.2d 1240 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Cecil W. CHANDLER, III, Defendant. No. 98-40003-01-GTV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 14, 1998. *1241 *1242 Charles D. Dedmon, David J. Phillips, Office of Federal Public Defender, Topeka, KS, Steven J Schweiker

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: The defendant, Michael Lee Chandler, appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of possessing cocaine base with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). For the reasons set forth below, we vacate and remand for resentencing. I. On July 21, 1995, Houston Police Officer Steve F

957 F.Supp. 1505 (1997) UNITED STATES of America v. David Ronald CHANDLER, a/k/a Ronnie Chandler. Nos. CR90-H-266-E, CV-95-H-8005-E. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. April 7, 1997. *1506 Natasha Zalkin, John R. Martin, Martin Bros., P.C., Atlanta, Ga, for petitioner David Ronald Chandler in No. CV95-H

950 F.Supp. 1522 (1996) UNITED STATES of America v. David Ronald CHANDLER, a/k/a Ronnie Chandler. Nos. CR90-H-266-E, CV95-H-8006-E. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. December 17, 1996. *1523 *1524 *1525

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 22-1786 _______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES CHANDLER, Appellant _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

950 F.Supp. 1545 (1996) UNITED STATES of America v. David Ronald CHANDLER, a/k/a Ronnie Chandler. Nos. CR90-H-266-E, CV95-H-8006-E. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. December 17, 1996. *1546 *1547 *1548