Cases

STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants challenge the district court’s finding of guilt against them in one-count informations for trespassing on a military installation in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1382. We reverse their convictions because the government did not prove an essential element of its case. I. BACKGROUND Ap

289 F.3d 168 UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Raúl MULERO-JOUBERT, Iván Sobrado-Sierra, Carlos R. Aguirre-Flores, Angel Carmona-Tapia, José Molina-Encarnación, Juan Santos-Centeno, Carlos Santiago-Rivera, and Angel Luis Class-Alvarado, Defendants, Appellants. No. 01-1869. No. 01-1870. No. 01-1871. No. 01-1872.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1346 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. WILLIAM GREGORIO AGRAMONTE-QUEZADA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 17-1367 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ CENTENO-GONZÁLEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 17-1432 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. IDALIA MALDONADO-PEÑA, Defendant, Appellant. No. 17-1551 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. JUAN RIVERA-GEORGE, a/k/a TIO,

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roman Leon Centeno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cen-teno has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT Opinion filed by Burton, Chief Judge. This interlocutory appeal arises from the Military Commission Judge’s decision to “terminate! ] proceedings of the military commission with respect to a charge or specification”- , under 10 U.S.C. § 950d(a)(1), See Manual' for Military Commissions (2012) (M.M.C), Rule for'Military Commissions (R.M.C-) 908(a)(

OPINION McKEE, Chief Judge. This appeal arises from the convictions of four men belonging to a violent heroin trafficking organization that operated out of Atlantic City, New Jersey. Over the course of two and a half years, law enforcement officials documented the extensive reach of this organization and the crimes its members committed. Thirty-four peop

530 F.3d 36 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Paul A. DeCOLOGERO; John P. DeCologero, Jr.; Paul J. DeCologero; Joseph F. Pavone, Defendants, Appellants. Nos. 06-1274, 06-2390, 06-2391, 06-2392, 06-2569, 07-1086. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard April 8, 2008. Decided June 23, 2008. *46

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-50411 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-04-00182-MJL GUMERCINDO SALAZAR-GONZALEZ, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-50411 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-04-00182-MJL GUMERCINDO SALAZAR-GONZALEZ, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States Distric

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge. ORDER DefendanU-Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing, filed June 5, 2006, is GRANTED. The disposition filed on April 21, 2006 is amended and replaced by the disposition filed concurrently with this order. No further petitions for rehearing will be entertained by this court. OPINION Defendant-appella

OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Gumercindo Salazar-Gonzalez (“Salazar-Gonzalez”) appeals his conviction for being found in the United States without the consent of the Attorney General in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. At trial, the district court refused to give Salazar-Gonzalez’s proposed jury instruction requiring the government to prove

911 F.Supp. 261 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Victor Manuel DOMINGUEZ. Criminal No. L-95-241. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Laredo Division. December 26, 1995. *262 Juan Ramon Flores, Federal Public Defenders Office, Laredo, TX, Adriana Arce-Flores, Fed. Public Defender, Laredo, TX, Victor Manuel Dominguez, Rio B

625 F.2d 834 Roy and Josie FISHER, next of kin of Elizabeth Fisher, Boydand Elizabeth Lewis, next of kin of Elizabeth, Ellen,Warren, and Jeff Lewis; Lloyd D. and Virginia Hall, next ofkin of Kenneth and Lloyd D. Hall; and George and Joyce BrownHutton, next of kin of Mondre Hutton; all on behalf of anypersons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,andUnited States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee,v.TUCS

ORDER- KATHLEEN CARDONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Petitioner Efrain Chavez-MaldonadO’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Petition”), ECF No. 1. For the reasons set forth herein, the Petition is hereby GRANTED in part. I. BACKGROUND Petitioner is a citizen and national of Mexico, residing in Chihua

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-2015 SELCUK KARAMANOGLU, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. TOWN OF YARMOUTH; BRIAN ANDREASEN, individually; DANIEL GALLANT, in his capacity as Chief of Police of the Yarmouth Police Department, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Filed 6/29/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JOSE ADAN MEDINA, Petitioner, v. G059331 THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE (Super. Ct. No. 16NF3065) COUNTY,

Filed 7/15/20 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A155630 v. QUENTIN BOWEN, (Sonoma County Defendant and Appellant. Super. Ct. No. SCR-701060) Defendant Quentin Bowen appeals from a judgment after a jury trial finding

Filed 2/20/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, F076022 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F14904214) v. SAMUEL TRINIDAD MEDELLIN, OP