Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Castillo-Madrid”
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On
United States v. Riojaspublic domain
Case: 24-40378 Document: 61-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/04/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-40378 FILED
United States v. Smithpublic domain
Case: 20-50304 Document: 00515850470 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 5, 2021
United States v. Millerpublic domain
TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge. Rodney Miller was sentenced as a career offender under the 1998 version of the Sentencing Guidelines, based in part on his prior conviction for a crime of violence. After the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), Miller filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate
United States v. Folsepublic domain
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Kevin Folse's Formal Objections to Presentence Report, filed May 15, 2017 (Doc. 223)("Objections"). The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendant Kevin Folse qualifies for a "career offender" sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 based on his prior felony convictions for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and
United States v. Tittiespublic domain
MATHESON, Circuit Judge. Damion Tittle1 pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which bars felons from possessing firearms. This crime carries a maximum sentence of 10 years, see 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2), but the Government argued Mr. Tittle’s sentence should be enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), see 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). The enhancement — a mandatory
United States v. Duretepublic domain
AMENDED * ORDER GRANTING 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION William J. Martinez, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Armando Durete’s Motion to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (ECF No. 41.)1 For the reasons explained below, the petition is granted, Durete’s criminal judgment is vacated, and this matter will be set for re-sentencing.</
United States v. Madridpublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. At issue is whether appellant Jonathan Madrid’s prior conviction for statutory rape in Texas qualifies as a crime of violence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Applying the familiar modified categorical approach, and in light of Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), we hold that it do
United States v. Kareem Doctorpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-4764 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KAREEM ANTWAN DOCTOR, Defendant – Appellant, Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:13-cr-00811-PMD-1) A
United States v. Madridpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID BRIONES, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants Jesus Madrid (“Madrid”) and Billy Omar Ruvalcaba-Madrid’s (“Ruvalcaba”) (collectively “Defendants”) Motions to Suppress Wiretap Evidence [ECF Nos. 168, 169] and the United States of America’s (“the Government”) respective Response [ECF Nos. 174, 175]. Also before the Court are Defendants’ Motions
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ Nos. 23-2123, 23-2800 & 23-3136 _______________ ELFIDO GONZALEZ CASTILLO, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA _______________ On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of
United States v. Westpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 26-00047 (AHA) MARK ANTOINE WEST, Defendant. Memorandum Opinion and Order Mark Antoine West moves to suppress a gun and ammunition that officers obtained after stopping and arresting him at a restaurant,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge *. Plaintiffs — states, cities, citizens’ groups, and individual citizens and taxpayers — seek a judgment: (1) vacating former Secretary of Commerce Robert Mosbacher’s July 15,1991 decision that the 1990 census would not be statistically adjusted; (2) ordering that such an adjustment be made; and (3) allowing plaintiffs to use and p
United States v. Territory of the Virgin Islandspublic domain
*404 MEMORANDUM OPINION LEWIS, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Terminate Prospective Relief, which was filed on July 28, 2011, and on which this Court heard oral argument on December 6, 2011.1 The litigation, which began in 1986, concerns the issue of continuing Eighth Am
United States v. Mertonpublic domain
274 F.Supp.2d 1156 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Mark B. MERTON, a/k/a Mark B. Williams, Alexander S. Rector, and Will Lancaster, Defendants United States of America, Plaintiff, v. John D. Sposit, Nathan J. Kern, and David Login, Defendants. United States of America, Plaintiff, v. John D. Sposit, Copy W. Hynes, Megan M. Schey, Reynaldo R. Mendoza, Shawn Sweeney, Nathan J. Kern, Shawn Hartnett, Justin C. Ly
United States v. Zuno-Arcepublic domain
25 F.Supp.2d 1087 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ruben ZUNO-ARCE, Defendant-Movant. Nos. CV 98-2930-ER, CR 87-422(G)-ER. United States District Court, C.D. California. August 18, 1998. *1088 *1089 *1090 *1091
213 F.3d 1269 (10th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.IRIS COLLETTE JACKSON; DWIGHT DEAN JACKSON, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 98-6487 & 99-6090 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, TENTH CIRCUIT June 2, 2000 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma (D
United States v. Claudio Gonzalez-Torrespublic domain
BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendant, Claudio Gonzalez-Torres, was tried by jury on a three count indictment: knowingly, willfully, and unlawfully possessing, with intent to distribute, approximately 3.627 kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (Count One); knowingly, willfully, and unlawfully importing said cocaine into the United States from the Republi
624 F.2d 196 199 U.S.App.D.C. 359 UNITED STATES of Americav.Willie DECOSTER, Jr., (Decoster III), Appellant. No. 72-1283. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Oct. 19, 1976.As Amended Oct. 21, Nov. 16 and 24, 1976.Argued En Banc May 26, 1977.Judgment Filed May 14, 1979.