Cases

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Hugo Ivan Castaneda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castaneda has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the recor

ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS HONORABLE ALEX KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation The court considers defendant Marcos Castaneda’s motion to correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and the government’s motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND Castaneda was convicted of four counts of armed bank robbery in 1994. PSR ¶ 1. The

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Jose Castaneda-Cornejo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castaneda-Cornejo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brie

ORDER Honorable G. Murray Snow, United States District Judge Defendant Ruben Lee Castaneda (“Mr. Castaneda”) moves to suppress the fruits of a warrantless search and un-Miran-dized questioning that took place at the scene of his arrest on July 9, 2015. (Doc. 16.) Mr. Castaneda also moves to suppress his recorded statements made to El Mirage Police Department (“EMPD”) officers during his interrog

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Castaneda-Estupian has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castaneda-Estupian has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fernando Castaneda-Quiroz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castaneda-Quiroz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Eberth Castaneda-Benitez has moved for *203leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011), Castaneda-Beni-tez has not filed a res

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Castaneda-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castaneda-Garcia has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s br

MEMORANDUM ** Nicandro Castaneda-Guardiola appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 37-month sentence imposed following his bench-trial conviction for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. *502Castaneda-Guardiola conte

*679MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Medina Castaneda appeals from the 262-month sentence imposed following this court’s remand for resentencing after his jury-trial conviction for offenses related to a conspiracy to distribute and possess cocaine and cocaine base. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Castaneda c

*679MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Medina Castaneda appeals from the 262-month sentence imposed following this court’s remand for resentencing after his jury-trial conviction for offenses related to a conspiracy to distribute and possess cocaine and cocaine base. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Castaneda c

739 F.Supp.2d 49 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. David E. CASTANEDA-CASTILLO. No. 10M-1013-JGD. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 17, 2010. *50 Andrew E. Lelling, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff. Ian Gold, Federal Public Defender Office, William P. Joyce, Joyce and Associa

*571[UNPUBLISHED] PER CURIAM. Julian Castaneda appeals the 140-month prison sentence the district court1 imposed following this court’s remand for resentencing under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

OPINION SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. Gabriel Castaneda-Sicardo (a/k/a Luis Alvarado), a citizen of Mexico, pled guilty to one count of illegal re-entry following his removal subsequent to his conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a), (b)(2). Castaneda-Si-cardo was sentenced to eighty-seven months imprisonment. His counsel, who filed a timely notice of appeal, also filed a motio

MEMORANDUM ** Silverio Castaneda-Maciel appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Castaneda-Maciel’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no arguable grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. W

OPINION SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. Gabriel Castaneda-Sicardo (a/k/a Luis Alvarado), a citizen of Mexico, pled guilty to one count of illegal re-entry following his removal subsequent to his conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a), (b)(2). Castaneda-Si-cardo was sentenced to eighty-seven months imprisonment. His counsel, who filed a timely notice of appeal, also filed a motio

MEMORANDUM ** Silverio Castaneda-Maciel appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Castaneda-Maciel’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no arguable grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. W

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Fernando Castaneda-Perez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007),

MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Lozano Castaneda appeals the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because appellant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the se

MEMORANDUM ** Juan Manuel Castaneda-Corona appeals from the jury-trial conviction and 120-month sentence imposed for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Castaneda-Corona’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to