Cases

19-1662-cv; 19-1813-cv Ventura de Paulino; Navarro Carrillo v. New York City Dep’t of Educ. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2019 No. 19-1662-cv ROSA ELBA VENTURA DE PAULINO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/N/G OF R.P., Plaintiff-Appellant,

No. ____________ In The RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 5/27/2015 Court of Criminal Appeals ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK Austin, Texas In re Dav

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

*939(Reported below: 10 Fed. Appx. 608); *940(13 Fed. Appx. 541); (20 Fed. Appx. 609); C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Case: 21-50795 Document: 00516550269 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 18, 2022

MEMORANDUM * Jose Navarro appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants on Navarro’s First, Fourth and Eighth Amendment claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand to the district court. We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunit

825 F.Supp. 19 (1993) UNITED STATES of America v. Martha CONCEPCION, a/k/a Martha Martinez, a/k/a Martha Morales, a/k/a Julianna Sanchez, a/k/a Sonia Serrano, a/k/a Gladys Torres, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Ana MORILLO, a/k/a Rossi Colon, a/k/a Marta Fernandez, a/k/a Luz Lopez, a/k/a Gloria Velez, a/k/a Jeanette Ruiz, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Jane ARENDELL, a/k/a Maria Gonzalez, a/k/a Annette Rive

808 F.Supp. 166 (1992) UNITED STATES of America v. Martha CONCEPCION, a/k/a Martha Martinez, a/k/a Martha Morales, a/k/a Julianna Sanchez, a/k/a Sonia Serrano, a/k/a Gladys Torres, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Virginia FIGUEROA, a/k/a Patris Gordon, a/k/a Lillian Navarro, a/k/a Juana Martinez, a/k/a Rita Pagan, a/k/a Mary Puig, a/k/a Rosa Rivera, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Theresa Amelia ROMAN, a/k/a

WALLACE, Chief Judge: In these two cases that have been consolidated for appeal, Garcia and Carrillo challenge the sentences,they received following their convictions. Garcia pleaded guilty to several counts of unarmed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a); Carrillo was convicted, after a jury trial, of one count of armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113

863 S.W.2d 191 (1993) Daniel NAVARRO v. The STATE of Texas. No. 3-91-512-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. September 15, 1993. Rehearing Overruled October 20, 1993. *194 Art Keinarth, Reynolds & Keinarth, Smithville, for appellant. Charles D. Penick, Crim. Dist. Atty., John M. Hawkins, Asst. Dist.

158 S.W.3d 663 (2005) Silverio ZUNIGA and Refugia Zuniga, Appellants, v. NAVARRO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and Rashay A. Koster Chapa, Individually, Appellees. No. 13-01-00852-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. March 10, 2005. Rehearing Overruled April 7, 2005. *665 Randall P. Crane, Law Office

OPINION ROSENTHAL, District Judge: Five defendants appeal their convictions or sentences for selling unregistered securities. The defendants worked for telemarketing “boiler rooms” in California and Florida, soliciting investments in partnerships to finance the production and distribution of movies. The defendants promised potential investors that the in

OPINION AND ORDER JAMES T. MOODY, District Judge. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 14, 2008, defendant Sidney Sellers was indicted on one count of possessing with the intent to distribute fifty or more grams of crack in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), one count of possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and one count of poss

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN NO. 3-91-512-CR DANIEL NAVARRO, APPELLANT vs.

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. After a sting operation involving two confidential informants and substantial audio and video surveillance, federal law enforcement officers caught Jesus Cabral-Ramirez (“Mr. Cabral”) and Defendants Appellant Maria Gutierrez de Lopez (“Ms. Gutierrez”) attempting to transport an undocumented alien from El Paso, Texas to Denver, Colorado. A federal grand

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Nos. 03-30355 Plaintiff-Appellant, 03-30371 v. 03-30356 JOSE LUIS ORTIZ-HERNANDEZ,  D.C. No. CR-00-00071-JAR Defendant-Appellee. District of Oregon,

NUMBER 13-01-00852-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF T

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 03-2056 & 03-2171 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARTURO GARCIA PARRA and MAGDALENA CORREA, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States District Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: In this interlocutory appeal from a suppression order, the government argues that F.R.Cr.P. 41(d) does not require agents to serve a copy of a search warrant on a person present at the search of her property. Instead, the government contends that Rule 41(d) is satisfied if a copy of the warrant is left behind at the scene after the search is completed, even if the person is first arrested and thus has n