Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and J. STEPHENS, Appellate Military Judges. _________________________ In Re Juan C. CARRILLO 1 Petitioner No. 9900334 Decided: 30 October 2019 Review of Petit

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Yulian Carrillo-Tamayo (Tamayo) appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion seeking a sentence reduction under Amendments 750, 759, and 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Israel Carrillo-Zavala has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Carrillo-Zavala has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rele

MEMORANDUM ** Juan Carrillo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the condition of supervised release requiring him to abstain from consuming alcohol. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Carrillo did not object to the condition of supervised release in the district court, and we therefore review for plain error. See United States v. Maciel

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal ease, Lino Isaac Carrillo-Hernandez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16-6259). In Gonzalez-Longoria, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), which defines a crime of violence when incorporated by re

MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Jose Carrillo appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826; and the revocation of supervised release and the sentence of seven months and 14 days imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 139

ORDER Aran Carrillo pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess with intent to distribute heroin, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced him to 120 months’ imprisonment, the statutory minimum given that the conspiracy involved 15 kilograms, see id. § 841(b)(l)(A)(I). On appeal Carrillo challenges the district court’s decision not to apply the “safety valve,” which would have allowed a sentence below the mandatory

660 F.3d 914 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel Antonio CARRILLO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50243. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 18, 2011. *917 Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Diane D. Kirstein (argued), San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff-Appellee. Thomas S. Morgan (argu

MEMORANDUM ** Ramon Esperanza Carrillo appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Carrillo contends that the district court procedurally erred by not responding to his non-frivolous arguments in mitigatio

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar Carrillo-Morales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Carrillo-Morales has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar Carrillo-Morales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Carrillo-Morales has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

590 F.3d 538 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Uriel CARRILLO-ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-3863. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 15, 2009. Decided January 5, 2010. *539 Kaarina Salovaara (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for

(2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Abraham CARRILLO-MORONES, Defendant. No. EP-07-CR-1624(21)-PRM. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. June 23, 2008. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered Defendant Abraham Carrillo-Moro

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cosme Armando Carrillo-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Carrillo-Martinez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. A

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cosme Armando Carrillo-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Carrillo-Martinez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. A

MEMORANDUM ** Oscar William Carrillo-Turcios appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Carrillo-Turcios contends that the district court erred when it found that he had

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered Defendant Abraham Carrillo-Morones’s “Bill of Particulars,” filed on April 23, 2008, the Government’s “Brief and Response to Defendants’s Motion for Bill of Particulars,” filed on April 29, 2008, and Defendant’s “Reply to the Government’s Response,” filed on May 13, 200

MEMORANDUM ** Edgardo Gracia Carrillo appeals the 60-month sentence imposed after he pled guilty to unlawful re-entry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) & (b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we remand. Because Gracia Carrillo was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the reco

(2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Abraham CARRILLO-MORONES, Defendant. No. EP-07-CR-1624(21)-PRM. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. June 24, 2008. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IN COURT IDENTIFICATION PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, District Judge. On this day, the Court sua sponte considered the ab

PER CURIAM.* Miguel Supinio Carrillo (“Supinio”) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation. Supinio argues pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are elements of the offense, not