Cases

542 U.S. 912 CARDENAS-GUTIERREZv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-10276. Supreme Court of United States. June 14, 2004. 1 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 87 Fed. Appx. 9.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

*1288 ALARCON, Circuit Judge: Gutberto Beltran-Gutierrez (Gutierrez) appeals from the judgment of conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin and possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B)©, and 18 U.S.C. § 2. He contends

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Defendant Tranquilinia LeguizamonDiaz (“Defendant”), a Paraguayan national, was convicted after a jury trial of bribery of a public official and conspiracy to bribe a public official, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 201(b)(1)(A), 2, 371. The district court (McAvoy, J.) sentenced Def

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendant-appellant Maria Rosalba Guevara appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, /.), convicting her, following a jury trial, of, inter alia, conspiring to distribute and possess with inte

(Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 516); (101 Fed. Appx. 466); (101 Fed. Appx. 513); (101 Fed. Appx. 458); (101 Fed. Appx. 511); (101 Fed. Appx. 451); (101 Fed. Appx. 541); (101 Fed. Appx. 520); (101 Fed. Appx. 496); (101 Fed. Appx. 463); (101 Fed. Appx. 489); (101 Fed. Appx. 4

PER CURIAM.* Diego Romero-Luna appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Romero-Luna contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 417 (fifth judgment); 72 Fed. Appx. 193 (first judgment), 212 (third judgment), 224 (ninth judgment), 228 (eighth judgment), 974 (sixth judgment), 985 (seventh judgment), and 993 (fourth judgment); 73 Fed. Appx. 689 (second judgment).

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 417 (fifth judgment); 72 Fed. Appx. 193 (first judgment), 212 (third judgment), 224 (ninth judgment), 228 (eighth judgment), 974 (sixth judgment), 985 (seventh judgment), and 993 (fourth judgment); 73 Fed. Appx. 689 (second judgment).

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Sean W. HARRINGTON, Airman First Class United States Air Force, Appellant No. 22-0100 Crim. App. No. 39825 Argued Oct. 26, 2022—Decided

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Sean W. HARRINGTON, Airman First Class United States Air Force, Appellant No. 22-0100 Crim. App. No. 39825 Argued Oct. 26, 2022—Decided

Case: 20-51054 Document: 00516272312 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 7, 2022

Appellate Case: 20-6118 Document: 010110650907 Date Filed: 03/01/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 1, 2022

Case: 21-50642 Document: 189-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 21-50642 June 7, 2024

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, AMENDED OPINION *

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

24-2734 U.S. v. Cardenas In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2025 (Argued: January 14, 2026 Decided: February 18, 2026) Docket No. 24-2734 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Paul Suarez for his involvement in a drug trafficking conspiracy and for firearms offenses. Suarez appeals contending that the convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence. He also asserts that the district court erred in imposing a 120-month (ten year) mandatory minimum prison sentence for possession of a sawed-off shotgun in furtherance of

PER CURIAM: This appeal arises from the convictions of Defendants-Appellants Cristobal Velasquez, also known as Little Chris (“Velasquez”), Raul Rodriguez, also known as Fat Boy (“Rodriguez”), George Sanchez, also known as Curious (“Sanchez”), and Mike Cassiano (“Cassiano”) (collectively, “Defendants”) because of their involvement in racketeer