Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Garcia-Cardenas appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Garcia-Cardenas’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We hav

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Garcia-Cardenas appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Garcia-Cardenas’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We hav

555 F.3d 1049 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus GARCIA-CARDENAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-50117. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted February 3, 2009.[*] Filed February 17, 2009. Shaffy Moeel, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for appellant Jesus Garcia-Cardenas. <

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-50117 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. 3:06-cr-02425-L-1 JESUS GARCIA-CARDENAS, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  App

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM: The district court dismissed an indictment for “willfully misapplying]” funds obtained under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act [CETA], 29 U.S.C. § 801-999 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980), 1 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 665 (1976), because the government

BERZON, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals were brought by defendants seeking to reduce their sentences for drug-related crimes. They invoke 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows a court to reduce in certain circumstances a previously imposed sentence, and contend that the Supreme Court's recent interpretat

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

NUMBER 13-09-00560-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBUR

NUMBER 13-09-00560-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF ARMANDO GARCIA CARDENAS, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Cameron County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Y

524 F.3d 600 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus Ignacio RAMOS-CARDENAS; Jorge Alberto Aguirre-Melecio; Guillermo Lopez-Quezada; Roman Arguelles-Aguirre; Francisco Melecio-Arguelles; Ramon Obregon-Lopez; Jose Melecio-Arguelles; Juan Pedro Hurtado-Garcia; Gabriel Melecio-Arguelles; Francisco Javier Aguirre-Melecio; Jaime Suarez-De La Rosa, Defendants-Appellants. No. 06-51383. U

(Reported below: 76 Fed. Appx. 562); (75 Fed. Appx. 940); (78 Fed. Appx. 397); (78 Fed. Appx. 436); (79 Fed. Appx. 627); (79 Fed. Appx. 631); (79 Fed. Appx. 616); (79 Fed. Appx. 621); (79 Fed. Appx. 622); (79 Fed. Appx. 623); (79 Fed. Appx. 624). C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari

(Reported below: 76 Fed. Appx. 562); (75 Fed. Appx. 940); (78 Fed. Appx. 397); (78 Fed. Appx. 436); (79 Fed. Appx. 627); (79 Fed. Appx. 631); (79 Fed. Appx. 616); (79 Fed. Appx. 621); (79 Fed. Appx. 622); (79 Fed. Appx. 623); (79 Fed. Appx. 624). C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge. This appeal calls upon us to consider the propriety of the cumulative application of sentencing enhancements. Appellants Teodulfo Cardena-Garcia and Cristobal Garcia-Suarez jointly 1 appeal from the district court’s enhancement of their sentences under both United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.

(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 117); (95 Fed. Appx. 606); (93 Fed. Appx. 663); (95 Fed. Appx. 118); (95 Fed. Appx. 582); (95 Fed. Appx. 629); (95 Fed. Appx. 661); (95 Fed. Appx. 662); (95 Fed. Appx. 630); (95 Fed. Appx. 645); (92 Fed. Appx. 990); (95 Fed. Appx. 631); <

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.