Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
10 opinions for “United States v. Camacho-Mondragon”
United States v. Duartepublic domain
569 F.3d 528 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge Heriberto DUARTE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-50902. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 1, 2009. Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Mark Randolph Stelmach, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Antonio, TX, for U.S. Judy Fulmer Madewell, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Fed. Pub. Defenders, San Antonio, TX,
United States v. VanMeterpublic domain
BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Brent Eugene VanMe-ter, the defendant, of accepting a bribe in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666. On appeal, Mr. VanMeter asserts the following: (1) the trial court should have suppressed wiretap communications obtained pursuant to a court order that included unlawful references to offenses not subject to wiretap investigation; (2) government agents violated the “necessity” require
United States v. $493,850.00 in U.S. Currencypublic domain
BEEZER, Circuit Judge: Roy Bruno (“Bruno”) and Miguel Camacho (“Camacho”) (collectively, “Claimants”) appeal the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the government in its civil forfeiture action against $493,850 in U.S. currency and one 1993 Ford F-350 truck. We affirm. I On June 3, 2003, Officer Jo
Bruce Church, Inc. v. United Farm Workers of Americapublic domain
169 Ariz. 22 (1991) 816 P.2d 919 BRUCE CHURCH, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, a labor organization, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 89-180. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. January 15, 1991. Review Denied October 8, 1991.[*]
Ford v. The Silver Fpublic domain
Filed 3/25/25; certified for publication 4/8/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- BILLY FORD, C099113 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2022
Opinion JOHNSON, J. Penal Code section 1305, subdivision (g) provides a means for exonerating the bail of a fleeing defendant if the bail bond agency locates the defendant in another jurisdiction and brings him before a local law enforcement officer but the district attorney elects not to seek the defendant’s extradition. The question in this case is whether the bonding company satisfied the statutory requireme
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN
869 F.Supp. 80 (1994) Antonio Jose Pacheco MOTTA, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent/Defendant. Civ. A. No. 94-11819-DPW. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 28, 1994. Judgment November 29, 1994. *81 *82
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV