Cases

697 F.Supp.2d 244 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wilfredo ROSARIO-CAMACHO, Luis Rodriguez-Sostre, Josue Perez-Mercado, Ramon Maysonet-Soler, Jose Negron-Sostre, Defendants. Criminal No. 08-310 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 22, 2010. David Ramos-Pagan, Jorge L. Armenteros-Chervoni, San Juan, PR, for Defendant Jose Rodrigue

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 18b0005p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: AUSTIN CHIDI FELIX; DOROTHY IFY FELIX, ┐ Debtors. │ > No. 17-8004 │

___________ No. 95-4156 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Carlos Camacho-Bordes,

961 A.2d 458 (2008) 111 Conn.App. 801 STATE of Connecticut v. Rick FELIX. No. 29517. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued September 25, 2008. Decided December 30, 2008. *461 H. Jeffrey Beck, Bridgeport, for the appellant (defendant). Rocco A. Chiarenza, special deputy assistant st

LAY, dissenting. In 1985, Carlos Camaeho-Bordes entered a guilty plea to a drug trafficking offense pursuant to a plea agreement. The district court, the Honorable Paul A Magnuson, presiding, granted Camaeho-Bordes’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, finding that the government failed to fulfill its plea agreement and exhibited bad faith by deporting Camaeho-Bordes without giving him the opportunity to pre

127 S.Ct. 1413 (2007) Alicia G. LIMTIACO, Attorney General of Guam, Petitioner, v. Felix P. CAMACHO, Governor of Guam. No. 06-116. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 8, 2007. Decided March 27, 2007. *1416 Seth P. Waxman, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Beth S. Brinkmann, Washington, DC, for Res

350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position

MEMORANDUM ** Camacho appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Icicle Sea-foods, Inc., in his suit for recovery under the Jones Act, 46 App. U.S.C. § 688(a), and the admiralty common law doctrines of unseaworthiness and maintenance and cure. Because Camacho failed to produce evidence from which a reasonable fact finder could find in his favor at trial on the Jones Act and unseaworthiness c

PUBLISH FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 27, 2021 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court JOHN FITISEMANU; PALE TULI; ROSAVITA TULI; SOUTHERN UTAH PACIFIC ISLANDER COALITION, Plaintiffs - Appellees, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; USS. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; ANTONY BLINKEN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of State; IAN G. BROWNLEE, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Sta

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges. *1155ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION The government's motion to amend opinion, filed June 22, 2018, is GRANTED. The opinion filed on June 8, 2018, is amended as follows: On page 13 of the sli

JONES, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Felix Jara-Medina's (Jara) Motion to Dismiss Indictment. (# 25) For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Jara's Motion. BACKGROUND Jara is charged with Illegal Reentry having been ordered removed from the United States on two prior occasions. Jara's original order of removal occurred in February

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10457 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:15-cr-00300- KJD-NJK-1 HANS VINCENT EDLING, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court fo

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF No. 16-10457 AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00300- v. KJD-NJK-1 HANS VINCENT EDLING, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED OPINION

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Sentencing Memorandum, filed November 20, 2014 (Doc. 62)(“Senteneing Memorandum”). The Court held a sentencing hearing on December 4, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should impose a 16-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(1), beca

OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. On December 12, 2013, a grand jury indictment charged Rene Marquez-Perez (“Marquez”) with three counts of possession of narcotics with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c); and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WOLSKI, Judge. Plaintiffs in this ease are 278 current and former employees of the United States Post *6 al Service (USPS), residing in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. They allege that the USPS

MEMORANDUM ** Defendant-Appellant Johnny Felix Tal-labas appeals his conviction by a jury for the illegal transportation of aliens for profit in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii), (a)(l)(B)(i). Tallabas contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. He alleges that the evidence resulted from an *73illegal stop

MEMORANDUM ** Defendant-Appellant Johnny Felix Tal-labas appeals his conviction by a jury for the illegal transportation of aliens for profit in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii), (a)(l)(B)(i). Tallabas contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. He alleges that the evidence resulted from an *73illegal stop

15 F.3d 1083NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antonio CAMACHO, Petitioner,v.U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70566. United States Co