Cases

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 17-3752, 18-1253, 19-1129, 19-1189 _____________ COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; UNITED STATE

SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge. *555 The Women's Health Amendment to the Affordable Care Act ("ACA") mandated that women's health insurance include coverage for preventive health care. Through the Amendment, Congress directed the Health Resources and Services Administration ("HRSA"), a component o

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 17-3752, 18-1253, 19-1129, 19-1189 _____________ COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; UNITED STATES D

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. *500 I. INTRODUCTION The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Human Services ("Pennsylvania") appeals from a decision and order of the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania entered March 13, 2017, affirming a decision of

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. In this appeal, we review an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denying a motion to intervene filed by the Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home. The Little Sisters sought to intervene in litigation challenging regulations promulgated under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The Distri

OPINION OF THE COURT MANSMANN, Circuit Judge. The underlying issue in this case is whether the United States must comply with an administrative order issued by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources (“DER”) to clean up a site located on the United States’ property at the Navy Ships Parts Control Center (“Navy Control Center”) in Mechanics

MEMORANDUM SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge. In this employment discrimination action, the United States Attorney General sued the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, alleging that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has engaged in a “pattern or practice” of unlawful discrimination against females applying for employment as an entry level trooper with the Pennsylvania State Police, resulting in disparate

394 F.Supp. 261 (1975) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and Milton Shapp, Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al., Defendants. Milton J. SHAPP, Governor, et al., Plaintiffs to the Counterclaim, v. UNITED STATES of America and Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, et al., Defendants to Counterclaim. Civ. A. No. 74-860.</

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge In 2017, the League of Women Voters and a group of Pennsylvania Democratic voters filed a state court lawsuit challenging Pennsylvania's 2011 congressional districting map. The suit alleged the state's Republican lawmakers drew the congressional map to entrench Republican power in Pennsylvania's congressional delegation and disadvantage Democratic voters. Plaintiffs contended the Republican

423 F.2d 55 UNITED STATES of America ex rel. James Hoey FEAR, Appellant,v.COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania. No. 18106. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted January 19, 1970. Decided March 11, 1970.

312 F.Supp. 1 (1969) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. James ROBERTS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and Edward J. Hendrick, Supt. Civ. A. No. 69-2787. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. December 12, 1969. James Roberts, in pro. per. MEMORANDUM BODY, District Judge. Plaintiff brings this action for a declaratory j

405 F.2d 1004 UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Jon MUDRY, Appellant,v.COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Judges of the Court of Quarter Sessions, Arlen Specter, District Attorney, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, Edward J. Hendrick, Superintendent of Prisons, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, William C. Sennett, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. No. 17371. United States Court of Appe

273 F.Supp. 923 (1967) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Sp 4/C Norman WILCOX, U.S.A., Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent. Misc. No. 3619. United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania. September 26, 1967. *924 Norman Wilcox, pro se. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, Graterford, Pa., Arlen Specter, Di

343 F.2d 447 UNITED STATES of America ex rel. James W. McDONALD, Appellant,v.COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania. No. 15033. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued March 4, 1965. Decided March 29, 1965.

343 F.2d 605 UNITED STATES of America ex rel. James SLEBODNIK, Appellant,v.COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, David N. Myers,Superintendent, State Correctional Institution,Graterford, Pennsylvania. No. 15050. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued March 1, 1965.Decided March 25, 1965. Samuel D

FOLLMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on motion of defendant for summary judgment and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The facts which appear from the Complaint and affidavit filed on behalf of plaintiff and which are not disputed are as follows: By letter of October 9, 1945, the Chairman of the United States Surplus Property Board was asked, by C. M. W

214 F.Supp. 913 (1963) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Charles WATKINS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, and James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh 33, Pennsylvania. Civ. A. No. 62-627. United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania. March 8, 1963. *914 Charles Watkins, pro se. Paul A

287 F.2d 888 UNITED STATES ex rel. Acie ESTELLE, Appellant,v.COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al. and James F. Maroney,Superintendent, State Correctional Institution,Pittsburgh, Pa. No. 13396. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Submitted on Briefs Feb. 21, 1961.Decided March 27, 1961. Acie Es

MEMORANDUM Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (“Commonwealth”) appeals the decision of the United States Department of Health and Human Services Departmental Appeals Board (“Appeals Board”) concerning a Medicaid reimbursement dispute. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), a division of the United States Department of Health

OPINION DAMICH, Judge. I. Introduction This case is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania seeks an amount in excess of $75 million because of the refusal of the United States Department