Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent James Combs, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Combs has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions o

MEMORANDUM ** Matthew Aaron Combs appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Combs’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief

PER CURIAM. Fontez L. Combs pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a felon. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He was sentenced at the top of his Guidelines range to 33 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Combs argues that the district court committed clear error by refusing to address the merits of an untimely motion to suppress the gun underlying his conviction. But Combs waived this contention by pleading guilty uncon

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 06-2258 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANTOIN QUARLES COMBS a/k/a ANTOINE COMBS-QUARLES, a/k/a ANTOINE COMBS Defendant, Appellant. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on February 11,

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. A jury found Antoin Quarles Combs guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He was sentenced to 240 months’ imprisonment. In this appeal, Combs challenges his conviction on two grounds: first, that the trial court improperly declined to give his proposed jury instruction regarding witness intimidat

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-30486 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-02-00108-JKS/ ROBERT F. COMBS, AHB Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska

ORDER The opinion filed January 11, 2005 is amended as follows: 1) Page 406: Delete the sentence beginning, “Because there was no ...” and replace with “Because there was no Fourth Amendment violation, we affirm Combs’ conviction, but we issue a limited remand as to Combs’ claim of Sixth Amendment sentencing error. See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).”

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-30456 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-02-00108-1-JKS ROBERT F. COMBS, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED  OPINION Appeal fro

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-30456 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-02-00108-1-JKS ROBERT F. COMBS, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 United States v. Combs No. 01-5997 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0167P (6th Cir.) File Name: 04a0167p.06 _________________ OPINION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ______________

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Randy Combs entered a guilty plea to a charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). At sentencing, the district court applied a four-level enhancement to his offense level because it found that Combs used or possessed the firearm in connection with another felony offense, aggravated assault. Combs appeals the application of the four-level enh

HENRY, Circuit Judge. After a jury trial, Omar Combs and Bruce Paul Williams were convicted of conspiracy to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute of more than 100 pounds of marijuana. Each now appeals various aspects of his conviction and sentence. As the appeals share a factual history, we have consolidated them for the purpose of this disposition. We

GIERKE, Judge (dissenting): I disagree with the majority’s decision to give appellant 20 months’ confinement credit. I agree with Judge Crawford that we should apply waiver. This case represents sandbagging at its worst. Appellant did not raise the pretrial-punishment issue at his sentence rehearing and did not complain to the convening authority who approved the results of this rehearing.

109 F.3d 766 U.S.v.Combs** NO. 96-60008 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Feb 20, 1997 Appeal From: W.D.Miss. , No. 3:95-CR-13-B 1 DISMISSED.

66 F.3d 341 U.S.v.Combs* NO. 94-4872 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Aug 30, 1995 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla., No. 93-08092-CR-WJZ 2

*289 Opinion of the Court COX, Judge: In August and September 1990, the accused was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, Japan. Contrary to his pleas, he was convicted of willful disobedience of a lawful order not to be alone with his children, unpremeditated murder of his 18-mo

Opinion of the Court GIERKE, Judge: 1. Before a general court-martial, appellant pleaded guilty to wrongful use of cocaine and wrongful distribution of cocaine (3 specifications), in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 912a. He was sentenced by officer members to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 16 years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enli

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 99-2109 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID A. COMBS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, Benton Division. No. 98 CR 40044--J. Phil Gilbert, Chief Judge. Argued November 30, 1999--Decided July 25, 2000 Before MANION, KANNE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges. ROVNER, Circuit Judge. David A. Combs was charged with possession w

OPINION OF THE COURT RAICHLE, Senior Judge: This case is a government appeal pursuant to Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862 (1988). At trial, the military judge excluded evidence that was substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding. He made this ruling on 20 July 1993, and the trial counsel gave the military judge written notice of appeal of the ruling the following day. Our first encounter with the

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0002p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │